Impact of levator ani muscle avulsions on Manchester procedure outcomes: A 5-year follow-up study

Sissel Hegdahl Oversand1,2, Anne Cathrine Staff1,2, Ingrid Volløyhaug3

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

Insights

Levator ani muscle avulsion did not negatively impact outcomes 5 years after the Manchester procedure for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The Manchester procedure remains effective for POP, regardless of avulsion status.

Area of Science:

  • Urogynecology
  • Pelvic Floor Surgery
  • Female Pelvic Medicine

Background:

  • Levator ani muscle avulsion is a known risk factor for poor outcomes in native tissue pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair.
  • Previous studies showed no association between avulsion and outcomes 1 year after the Manchester procedure.
  • This study aimed to compare outcomes at 5 years in women with and without levator ani muscle avulsions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare patient-reported and anatomical outcomes, and failure rates at 5 years in women who underwent the Manchester procedure for POP, stratified by the presence or absence of levator ani muscle avulsion.
  • To assess the long-term impact of levator ani muscle avulsion on the efficacy of the Manchester procedure.

Main Methods:

  • A 5-year prospective cohort study of 143 women who underwent the Manchester procedure for anterior and/or mid-compartment POP.
  • Levator ani muscle avulsions were diagnosed via transperineal ultrasound at inclusion.
  • Outcomes assessed at 5 years included subjective bulge symptoms, overall pelvic floor symptoms, sexual distress, subjective cure rates, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) measurements, and need for further prolapse treatment.

Main Results:

  • The avulsion rate was 52.4% among the 143 women followed for 5 years.
  • Both avulsion and non-avulsion groups demonstrated similar improvements in bulge symptoms, pelvic floor symptoms, and anatomical measurements.
  • Women with avulsion experienced significantly greater improvement in sexual distress, but had half the odds of achieving an optimal anterior compartment outcome.

Conclusions:

  • Despite a lower likelihood of optimal anterior compartment outcome, levator ani muscle avulsion did not compromise overall anatomical changes or symptom improvement 5 years after the Manchester procedure.
  • The Manchester procedure is an effective and durable surgical option for women with POP, irrespective of levator ani muscle avulsion status.
  • Avulsion status did not influence patient-reported outcomes or the need for subsequent prolapse treatments.