Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Development of a Hepatitis B Virus Reporter System to Monitor the Early Stages of the Replication Cycle
Published on: February 1, 2017
The Cost-Effectiveness of Tenofovir Alafenamide for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus in Taiwan
Elise Chia-Hui Tan1, Alon Yehoshua2, Sushanth Jeyakumar3
1Department of Health Service Administration, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Insights
Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) offers better health outcomes for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV). This antiviral medication is a cost-effective choice for CHB management in Taiwan.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Virology
Background:
- Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a lifelong condition necessitating long-term treatment, posing significant economic challenges.
- Therapeutic selection for CHB requires careful consideration due to its chronic nature and economic impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) against tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) for CHB management.
- To assess these treatments from the perspective of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Administration payer over a lifetime horizon.
Main Methods:
- An individual patient simulation model was employed to assess treatment impacts on liver-related and safety outcomes in CHB.
- Data from clinical trials, real-world evidence, and published literature were utilized for clinical parameters, health utilities, and costs.
Main Results:
- TAF demonstrated fewer liver disease events and reduced bone and renal complications compared to TDF and ETV.
- TAF achieved higher rates of eAg and sAg seroconversion than TDF and ETV.
- TAF was more effective and more costly, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of USD 3,348/QALY vs. TDF and USD 3,940/QALY vs. ETV.
Conclusions:
- TAF provides superior health outcomes at acceptable incremental costs compared to TDF and ETV.
- TAF represents a cost-effective treatment option for managing chronic hepatitis B in Taiwan.
Abstract:
Background. Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a lifelong disease requiring long-term or indefinite therapy, resulting in substantial economic burden. Thus, careful consideration must be used in the selection of therapies. Aim. This analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) from the perspective of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Administration Healthcare payer for the management of CHB over a lifetime horizon. Methods. An individual patient simulation model assessed the impact of treatment on CHB infection for liver- and safety-related outcomes. Patients could achieve spontaneous or treatment-induced responses, experience a reactivation of the disease, develop long-term liver complications, or experience treatment-related renal or bone complications. Patient population profiles were based on clinical trial and real-world data. Data on clinical parameters (safety, mortality, resistance risk, and flare), health utilities, and costs were sourced from the published literature. Results. TAF was associated with fewer liver disease events and fewer cases of bone and renal complications per 100 person-years. TAF also had higher eAg and sAg seroconversion compared with TDF and ETV. As compared with both treatments, TAF was both more effective and more costly, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of USD 3,348 and USD 3,940 per quality-adjusted life-year gained versus TDF and ETV, respectively. Conclusion. TAF leads to better health outcomes at acceptable incremental costs compared with the most commonly used therapies in the management of CHB, thus making it a cost-effective option for the treatment of CHB in Taiwan.
Highlights:
The cost-effectiveness of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) was assessed in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Taiwan.TAF was associated with fewer liver disease events, fewer cases of bone and renal complications, and higher eAG and sAG seroconversion compared with TDF and ETV; TAF was found to be cost-effective compared with both treatments.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Hepatitis
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis
Viral Hepatitis I: Introduction

