Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
Published on: November 15, 2017
How to Train a Postprocessor for Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Database Search While Maintaining Control of the
Jack Freestone1, Lukas Käll2, William Stafford Noble3,4
1School of Mathematics and Statistics F07, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
None:
Decoy-based methods are a popular choice for the statistical validation of peptide detection in tandem mass spectrometry and proteomics data. Such methods can achieve a substantial boost in statistical power when coupled with postprocessors such as Percolator that use auxiliary features to learn a better-discriminating scoring function. However, we recently showed that Percolator can struggle to control the false discovery rate (FDR) when reporting the list of discovered peptides. To address this problem, we introduce Percolator-RESET, which is an adaptation of our recently developed RESET meta-procedure to the peptide detection problem. Specifically, Percolator-RESET fuses Percolator's iterative SVM training procedure with RESET's general framework to provide valid false discovery rate control. Percolator-RESET operates in both a standard single-decoy mode and a two-decoy mode, with the latter requiring the generation of two decoys per target. We demonstrate that Percolator-RESET controls the FDR in both modes, both theoretically and empirically, while typically reporting only a marginally smaller number of discoveries than Percolator in the single-decoy mode. The two-decoy mode is marginally more powerful than both Percolator and the single-decoy mode and exhibits less variability than the latter.

