Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Development of Amelogenin-chitosan Hydrogel for In Vitro Enamel Regrowth with a Dense Interface
Published on: July 10, 2014
Evaluating the effects of remineralizing agents on initial carious lesions
Suwimon Jettanacheawchankit1, Tuksaporn Pongpradit1, Amornrat Euapokai1
1Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Background:
Initial carious lesions are reversible, and fluoride-containing reagents effectively promote enamel remineralization in these initial lesions. Numerous remineralizing agents are available, some containing fluoride and others containing alternatives because of fluoride toxicity concerns. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the following remineralizing agents: fluoride varnish (5% NaF, Duraphat®), casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate paste (CPP-ACP, Tooth Mousse®), and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride paste (CPP-ACPF, Tooth Mousse Plus®) on initial carious lesions.
Materials And Methods:
Forty human maxillary premolar teeth were randomized into 4 experimental groups: distilled water, fluoride varnish, CPP-ACP, and CPP-ACPF. All 40 teeth were cut in half mesiodistally. A Vickers microhardness test was performed on the buccal half of each tooth; the lingual half was examined with a spectrophotometer for colour dimension. An Atomic Force Microscope was used to evaluate roughness. During the experiments, microhardness, colour, and roughness were examined 3 times: 1) before treatment; 2) after demineralization; and 3) after remineralization. At each stage, a scanning electron microscope was used to examine surface features and enable energy dispersive X-ray chemical composition analysis.
Results:
Demineralization carried out in preparation for testing of the agents caused enamel hardness to decrease significantly. Enamel roughness increased, although not significantly. After remineralization, each of the 3 remineralizing agents had significantly increased both hardness and lightness (L*), compared to the demineralized enamel. Each agent decreased enamel roughness, but the roughness change was not significant.
Conclusion:
Comparing the 3 remineralizing agents, there were no significant differences between the agents in effectiveness.
More Related Videos
08:20Systematic Approach to Identify Novel Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Molecules from Plants' Extracts and Fractions to Prevent Dental Caries
Published on: March 31, 2021
03:07Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Antacids
However, this neutralization reaction between...
Essential Minerals for Bone Health
Calcium and Phosphorus
Calcium is a critical component of bones, especially in the form of calcium phosphate and calcium carbonate. Since the body cannot make calcium, it must be obtained from the diet. However, calcium cannot be absorbed from the small intestine without...
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling