Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.2K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.2K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

38.6K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.6K
Rotter's Locus of Control01:14

Rotter's Locus of Control

177
Julian Rotter introduced the concept of locus of control, a cognitive factor that significantly influences personality development and learning. Locus of control refers to an individual's beliefs about the extent of control they have over events in their lives. According to Rotter, this belief system can be categorized into two types: internal and external locus of control.
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that their personal efforts and decisions directly affect their...
177
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is Prospective Memory Monitoring Governed by Dual Processes of Initiating a Retrieval Mode and Checking for Targets? A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Guynn (2003).

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Switching between cognitive control states? No, thank you.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

In search of precue benefits: Are people unmotivated to heighten control on demand?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Item-specific control of word reading as evidenced by a novel proportion wordness effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

The puzzle of profitless pre-cues.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Sequence effects during speech perception reveal multi-accent processing costs.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K

Does an external distractor interfere with the triggering of item-specific control?

Merve Ileri-Tayar1, Jihyun Suh1, Amina Stern1

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 1, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Item-specific control, which helps manage attention, remains effective even when unexpected distractions appear. This learned attentional control is robust against external stimuli, suggesting automatic processing.

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

9.7K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

9.7K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Attention research
  • Executive function

Background:

  • Individuals learn to link predictive cues with varying attentional demands.
  • Item-specific control involves reactively adjusting focus based on learned cue associations.
  • This control is thought to operate automatically, enabling efficient processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if external distractors interfere with the triggering of item-specific control.
  • To examine the robustness of learned attentional control settings.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments used a picture-word Stroop task with an acquisition and test phase.
  • Participants learned cue-conflict associations without distraction.
  • External visual or multisensory distractors were introduced during the test phase.

Main Results:

  • The item-specific proportion congruence effect was preserved despite distractor presence.
  • Learned control settings were triggered effectively in both distractor-present and distractor-absent trials.
  • Item-specific control demonstrated resilience to external distraction.

Conclusions:

  • Item-specific control is robust and not easily disrupted by salient external distractors.
  • The automaticity of item-specific control contributes to its resilience.
  • Further research should explore the boundaries of this robust attentional control.