Combating Medical Label Noise through more precise partition-correction and progressive hard-enhanced learning
Sanyan Zhang1, Surong Chu1, Yan Qiang2
1Imaging & Intelligence Lab, Taiyuan University of Technology, China.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
|April 1, 2025
Summary
This study introduces a novel framework to improve medical image classification accuracy by addressing noisy labels. The method effectively corrects label noise, enhancing diagnostic model performance on challenging datasets.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer-Aided Diagnosis
Background:
- Deep neural networks for medical diagnosis require high-quality labeled data.
- Manual annotation of medical images can introduce label noise due to complexity and expertise required.
- Label noise can negatively impact the training and performance of classification models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a noise-tolerant framework for medical image classification.
- To effectively address and mitigate the challenges posed by label noise in medical datasets.
- To improve the accuracy and robustness of computer-aided diagnosis systems.
Main Methods:
- A two-phase framework: fore-training correction and progressive hard-sample enhanced learning.
- Dual-branch sample partition detects clean, hard, and noisy instances.
- Hard-sample label refinement and joint correction enhance data quality.
- Progressive reinforcement learning improves feature representation learning.
Main Results:
- Achieved 82.39% accuracy on a pneumoconiosis dataset.
- Demonstrated robust performance on a five-class skin disease dataset with varying noise levels (up to 40%).
- Showcased high accuracy in binary polyp classification even with significant label noise (up to 40%).
Conclusions:
- The proposed framework effectively handles label noise in medical image classification.
- Demonstrated robustness and effectiveness across diverse datasets and noise levels.
- Validates the potential for improved computer-aided diagnosis systems with noisy labels.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...


