Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
Published on: March 3, 2023
Validation of JEM Soignances Job-Exposure Matrix Through Comparison with Self-Reported Exposures Among Healthcare
Allison Singier1, Marc Fadel2, Fabien Gilbert3
1Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)-UMR_S 1085, SFR ICAT, 49000, Angers, France. allison.singier@inserm.fr.
The JEM Soignances tool accurately assessed organizational and biomechanical occupational exposures in healthcare workers. However, it underestimated or missed associations for psychosocial exposures, highlighting areas for improvement in occupational health research.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- The occupational exposome of healthcare workers is complex and requires accurate assessment tools.
- A novel healthcare-specific job-exposure matrix, JEM Soignances, was developed to address this need.
- Validating new assessment tools against established methods is crucial for reliable occupational health research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of JEM Soignances against self-reported data for assessing occupational exposures in healthcare professionals.
- To evaluate the accuracy of JEM Soignances in estimating known associations between occupational exposures and health outcomes.
- To identify limitations of JEM Soignances, particularly for psychosocial exposures.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 12,219 healthcare professionals in the CONSTANCES cohort linked to the French National Healthcare Database (SNDS).
- Estimated exposures using JEM Soignances and an alternative version, considering binary and cumulative lifetime exposure.
- Compared JEM Soignances estimates with self-reported data using logistic regression for health outcomes like pain, depressive symptoms, hypertension, cancer, and psychoactive drug use.
Main Results:
- JEM Soignances showed good agreement with self-reported data for organizational (10/16 associations) and biomechanical exposures (11/15 associations).
- Discrepancies for other exposure types generally indicated underestimation by JEM Soignances.
- JEM Soignances significantly underestimated the association between effort-reward imbalance and depressive symptoms, while the alternative version failed to detect it.
Conclusions:
- JEM Soignances is a valid tool for organizational and biomechanical exposures but has limitations for psychosocial exposures.
- The tool often underestimates or misses associations related to psychosocial occupational factors.
- Further validation is required for biological, chemical, and physical exposures assessed by JEM Soignances.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
15:00Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
Related Concept Videos
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings I: Donning
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Stress Concentrations
The stress...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...