Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026
Normothermic Ex Vivo Kidney Perfusion for the Preservation of Kidney Grafts prior to Transplantation
Published on: July 15, 2015
The Flow of Living Kidney Donor Candidates Through the Evaluation Process: A Single-Center Experience in Ontario,
Steven Habbous1, Beth Montesi2, Christy Masse2
1Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Introduction:
Tracking the evaluation process of living kidney donor candidates facilitates benchmarking and can inform process redesign to improve experiences with the evaluation and enable more living donor kidney transplantation.
Methods:
We reviewed the medical records for all living donor candidates who were actively undergoing evaluation at any time between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, at the London Health Sciences Centre in London, Ontario, Canada. We abstracted information on demographic factors, the evaluation process, reasons for a delayed evaluation, reasons for an evaluation termination (eg, donation, decline, withdrawal, loss to follow-up), frequency and timing of evaluation testing, and recipient dialysis status.
Results:
Over time, the number of living donor kidney transplants increased from 22 in 2013 to 32 in 2016 (18% and 34% of which were pre-emptive, respectively). The median number of candidates coming forward doubled from 167 in 2013 (2 candidates per recipient) to 348 in 2016 (4 candidates per recipient). Median time from first contact until donation decreased from 12.8 months in 2013 to 7.1 months in 2016 (a 45% reduction). The time from computed tomography (CT) angiography until donation (n = 74) was a median of 75 (interquartile range [IQR] = 36, 180) days, the longest single step in the evaluation. Common reasons for delay included waiting for the referral of their intended recipient for transplant evaluation (11% of candidates) and a need for the donor candidate to lose weight (8% of candidates). Donors completed the main evaluation tests on a median of 5 different dates. Thirty-six recipients started dialysis after their living donor candidates' evaluation had been underway for at least 3 months.
Conclusion:
Tracking the steps and reasons for an inefficient living kidney donor evaluation process can be used for quality improvement, and efficiency improvements are expected to translate into improved outcomes and experiences.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
01:28Kidney Transplant I: Introduction