Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Left atrial strain as a surrogate parameter for successful percutaneous ballon mitral valvotomy?
Bhagwati Prasad Pant1, Rohit Walse1, Harikrishnan Sivadasapillai1
1Department of Cardiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Background:
Severe mitral stenosis (MS) leads to morphological and functional changes in the left atrium (LA) causing dysfunction. Relieving mitral obstruction improves the LA mechanics and structural remodelling. However, this is not taken as a measure of successful Ballon Mitral Valvotomy (BMV) in clinical practice.
Methods:
We studied the relationship between LA strain and severe MS and the short-term effect of BMV on LA mechanics in a prospective observational single-centre study.
Results:
Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was impaired in patients (n = 40) with severe MS and improved 24 h following BMV (11.93 ± 3.29% vs 14.96 ± 3.59%, p < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in transmitral gradient (12.0 ± 4 mmHg vs 3.2 ± 1.6 mmHg, p < 0.001) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) (42.0 ± 8 mmHg vs 40.0 ± 4.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) after the procedure. Mitral valve area (1.03 ± 0.27 cm2 vs 1.81 ± 0.31 cm2, p < 0.001) significantly increased after the procedure. Peak atrial longitudinal strain failed to predict the success of the procedure as (AUC: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.75, p = 0.791). A cut-off value of 11.42% demonstrated a sensitivity of 64.7% and specificity of 66.7%. (R = 0.33; 95% CI 0.09, 0.6, p = 0.038).
Conclusion:
Peak atrial longitudinal strain shows a significant improvement following a successful BMV. This increase in values reflects an improvement in clinical status and function class in follow-up. While PALS offers promise, it has limitations. Therefore, it seems reasonable to consider PALS as a supportive indicator alongside established markers like MV area and pressure gradient for assessing procedural success.
More Related Videos
08:31A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management