FE reduced-order model-informed neural operator for structural dynamic response prediction
Lai-Hao Yang1, Xu-Liang Luo1, Zhi-Bo Yang2
1School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, PR China.
Abstract:
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) have achieved remarkable advancements in recent years and have been extensively used in solving differential equations across various disciplines. However, when predicting structural dynamic responses, directly applying them to solve partial differential equations of structural dynamic models encounters challenges like inadequate result accuracy, inefficient training processes, and limited versatility. Furthermore, embedding large-scale structural dynamic models as physical constraints for neural networks can lead to poor trainability and low precision accuracy. To address the above issues, in this paper, we propose a novel FE reduced-order model-informed neural operator (FRINO) for structural dynamic response prediction with high precision, low computational cost, and broad versatility. Specifically, the Fourier neural operator (FNO) is employed to capture the dominant features of structural dynamic responses in the frequency domain, facilitating accurate and efficient solutions. Additionally, a reduced-order model derived using proper orthogonal decomposition is integrated to constrain the FNO. This ensures that the predicted solutions conform to physical differential equations, while also mitigating the high computational costs typically associated with large-dimensional physical equations. Special cantilever beam cases are designed to validate and evaluate the performance of the proposed FRINO. The comparative results demonstrate that FRINO can learn not only the responses of structural dynamic models but also the inherent dynamic characteristics of mechanical structure, allowing for precise predictions of structural responses under diverse unknown excitations. The results demonstrate that, compared with the PINN method, FRINO enhances prediction accuracy by up to two orders of magnitude and computation speed by up to three orders of magnitude. Besides, for practical use of FRINO, one should comprehensively consider the factors such as physical loss, training data resolution, and network width to obtain optimal performance of FRINO.
Related Concept Videos
Second Order systems II
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....
Second-order Op Amp Circuits
The analysis of such circuits follows a systematic approach, similar to the second-order RLC circuits. In practical scenarios, bulky inductors are rarely employed due to their size and weight. This means...
Second Order systems I
By reinterpreting the system, one can derive the closed-loop transfer function, which...
First Order Systems
When a first-order system is subjected to a unit-step input, its response is characterized by its transfer function. By applying the Laplace transform of the unit-step input to the transfer function, expanding the...


