Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Increasing Limb Length During Stage 1 Revision Leads to Higher Rates of Instability Following Stage 2 Revision Total
Ian M Clapp1, Dalton L Braathen1, Brenna E Blackburn1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Background:
Currently, two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty is the gold standard in managing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip; however, complications are common, including instability. The purpose of this study was to determine how alterations in limb length during a stage 1 articulating spacer affect dislocation rates of the stage 2 revision.
Methods:
A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for PJI between December 2013 and December 2022 was performed. We measured limb length as the perpendicular distance from the trans-teardrop line to the apex of the lesser trochanter after stage 1 articulating spacer implantation. Independent t-tests and logistic regression were used to compare limb lengths following stage 1 spacers between patients who did and did not dislocate after stage 2 implantation. Overall, 147 patients who underwent staged revisions for the treatment of PJI were identified. The cohort was 59% women who had a mean age of 60 years (range, 25 to 84 years) and an average follow-up time of 2.7 years (range, 1.0 to 9.1 years).
Results:
The dislocation rates after stage 1 and stage 2 were 3.0 and 11.7%, respectively. Limb length did not impact dislocation rates of the articulating stage 1 spacers (P = 0.71), but patients who sustained a dislocation following stage 2 were lengthened significantly more at stage 1 implantation (8.5 ± 15.9 versus 0.8 ± 11.8 mm, P = 0.033). Additionally, the odds of dislocation after stage 2 increased by 7% with each mm lengthened during stage 1 (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.13).
Conclusions:
During a stage 1 articulating spacer of the hip, limb length restoration is often disregarded, which can result in overlengthening that may necessitate subsequent shortening during stage 2 reconstruction. This study demonstrates that overlengthening of an articulating stage 1 hip spacer can place the patient at an increased risk of dislocation following stage 2 reconstruction.
More Related Videos
07:43In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...
One-Degree-of-Freedom System
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
Indeterminate Structure
Stability of structures
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...