Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neuroplasticity01:01

Neuroplasticity

254
Neuroplasticity reflects the brain's remarkable capacity to adapt and evolve, responding dynamically to learning, experiences, or injury by reorganizing its neural circuitry. This reorganization involves creating new neural connections and refining old ones through a series of biological processes that contribute to the brain's lifelong development and adaptability.
254
Cognitivism01:17

Cognitivism

1.3K
Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
1.3K
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology01:20

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

255
Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
255
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The prefrontal cortex controls memory organization in the hippocampus.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Profile of opioid peptide receptors in GnRH and kisspeptin neurons of female mice and rats.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2025
Same author

Open-source, high performance miniature 2-photon microscopy systems for freely behaving animals.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Deconstructing the intercellular interactome in vascular dementia with focal ischemia for therapeutic applications.

Cell·2025
Same author

Critical role of arcuate nucleus kisspeptin and Kiss1R in regulation of the ovine luteinizing hormone surge.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2025
Same author

A dual-pathway architecture for stress to disrupt agency and promote habit.

Nature·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
00:26

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

4.9K

How Might a 'Philosopher's Toolkit' Help Advance Neuroscience? Let's Ask Some Neuroscientists.

John Bickle1,2, Patricia Churchland3, Stuart Firestein4,5

  • 1College of Arts and Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA.

The European Journal of Neuroscience
|April 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Neuroscientists see value in philosophy for advancing brain research. Structured interviews revealed that philosophers can address key neuroscience questions and broader scientific challenges.

More Related Videos

Adaptable Angled Stereotactic Approach for Versatile Neuroscience Techniques
06:21

Adaptable Angled Stereotactic Approach for Versatile Neuroscience Techniques

Published on: May 7, 2020

4.9K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
00:26

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

4.9K
Adaptable Angled Stereotactic Approach for Versatile Neuroscience Techniques
06:21

Adaptable Angled Stereotactic Approach for Versatile Neuroscience Techniques

Published on: May 7, 2020

4.9K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • The integration of philosophical inquiry into scientific practice is an evolving area.
  • Understanding the perceived value of philosophical contributions by practicing scientists is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how a 'philosopher's toolkit' can advance neuroscience.
  • To identify specific areas where neuroscientists believe philosophers can offer valuable assistance.

Main Methods:

  • Structured interviews were conducted with neuroscientists experienced in collaborating with philosophers.
  • The interview methodology followed established practices, such as those described by Barwich.

Main Results:

  • Neuroscientists identified various issues that philosophers could help resolve.
  • There was consensus among participants that philosophers have important roles to play within neuroscience.
  • Diverse perspectives emerged regarding the composition of a 'philosopher's toolkit'.

Conclusions:

  • Prominent neuroscientists welcome philosophical contributions to both specific research questions and general scientific concerns.
  • These findings are particularly relevant for philosophers of science-in-practice and 'philosophers-in-science'.
  • The study offers insights for neuroscientists less familiar with philosophical collaboration, highlighting potential benefits.