Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
The dual role of empathy in clinical trial decisions
Mariam Chichua1,2, Chiara Filipponi1,2, Davide Mazzoni1
1Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Introduction:
Empathy is a key driver of prosocial behaviors, including motivations to participate in clinical trials. Our study aimed to explore how individuals' levels of empathy influence their intention to participate in a trial, examining scenarios where participants envision the decision for themselves (Condition 1 - "Self") and when they consider a hypothetical person (Condition 2 - "Other"), who has to take that decision.
Methods:
A between-subject design was conducted on 176 healthy participants (Mage = 31.98, SD = 10.14). All participants responded to socio-demographic questions and were assessed for empathy. They were randomly assigned to two conditions presenting a hypothetical cancer clinical trial and assessing the intention to partake in the trial.
Results:
The moderation regression model was statistically significant [R 2 = 0.10, F(7,167) = 2.04, p < 0.05]. Simple slopes analysis showed that for Condition 1, each unit increase in empathy was associated with 8.59 unit increase in intention to partake in a clinical trial [b = 8.59, SE = 4.04, 95% CI: 0.61, 16.6], whereas for Condition 2 each unit increase in empathy was associated with -9.77 unit decrease in intention [b = -9.77, SE = 3.78, 95% CI:-17.24, -2.3]. The slope of empathy on intention for condition 1 was significantly different than for condition 2 [Δ = 18.4, SE = 5.5, t (167) = 3.34, p < 0.001].
Discussion:
Empathy acts as a facilitator for partaking in trials when imagining having been diagnosed with cancer, while it becomes a barrier when thinking about another person's participation. The reversed effect of empathy on intention shown in this study may guide future research and healthcare providers to discuss further before enrolment, involving both patients and caregivers in the decision-making process.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
05:51Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 15, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Empathy
Ethical Dilemmas II
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Blinding
Ethics and Bioethics