Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems
Published on: May 2, 2025
Pressure Distribution Properties in Wound Dressings Using Heel and Sacrum Indenters Under Clinically Relevant Loads
Sandra Guzman1, Kasey Call, Marianne Russon
1Sandra Guzman, PhD, is Senior Test Engineer, EC-Service Inc., Centerville, Utah, USA; Kasey Call, BS, is Study Director, EC-Service Inc.; Marianne Russon, BA, is Quality Manager, EC-Service Inc.; Susan Jellum, MSN, APRN, FNP-C, is Human Subject Research, EC-Service Inc.; Jordan Fisk, MSc, is Senior Design Scientist, Convatec Ltd., Deeside, Flintshire, UK; and Evan Call, MS, CSM (NRM), is Faculty, Weber State University, Ogden, Utah.
New foam dressings (A and B) significantly reduced interface pressure compared to existing options, showing potential for pressure redistribution in vulnerable areas.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Materials Science
- Wound Care Technology
Background:
- Pressure ulcers remain a significant clinical challenge, necessitating advanced dressing technologies for effective prevention and management.
- Current dressings vary in their ability to redistribute pressure, impacting their efficacy in protecting vulnerable skin.
- Understanding the pressure distribution characteristics of novel dressings is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the pressure distribution characteristics of two next-generation multilayered foam dressings (A and B) against three commercially available dressings (C, D, and E).
- To compare the performance of these dressings under clinically relevant pressures using a novel pressure distribution model.
- To identify dressings with superior pressure redistribution capabilities for potential use in high-risk areas.
Main Methods:
- A novel pressure distribution model was employed, simulating overlying tissue with a silicone layer on a K45 foam support.
- High-resolution pressure mapping assessed dressings under clinically relevant loads (30 and 80 mm Hg) for 60 seconds.
- Anatomically accurate sacral and heel indenters were used, with statistical significance determined by 95% CI and t test (α = .05).
Main Results:
- All tested dressings reduced interface pressure and increased contact area compared to a no-dressing control (P < 0.05).
- Dressings A and B demonstrated lower peak pressures than dressings C and E across both indenters.
- Dressings D and B exhibited the largest contact areas and lowest pressures on heel indenters, while dressing E showed the smallest contact area and highest pressures.
Conclusions:
- Next-generation dressings A and B significantly reduced interface pressure, indicating potential benefits for pressure redistribution in vulnerable populations.
- A strong negative correlation was observed between average pressure and contact area, highlighting the importance of surface area for pressure management.
- Further clinical research is recommended to validate these findings across diverse healthcare settings and patient populations.
Related Concept Videos
Residual Stresses in Bending
Fluid Pressure over Flat Plate of Constant Width
The resultant force...
Saint-Venant's Principle
Fluid Pressure over Flat Plate of Variable Width
The pressure distribution on the plate can be calculated by determining the force that acts on a differential area strip of the plate. Thus, the magnitude of the force is equal to the...

