Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
Published on: October 28, 2021
Incomplete reporting and spin in acupuncture randomised controlled trials: a cross-sectional meta-epidemiological
Yuting Duan1,2,3, Pinge Zhao4, Yuening Deng5,2
1Evidence Based Medicine Center, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China duanyt@gzhmu.edu.cn yul@gzhmu.edu.cn.
Reporting and data sharing in acupuncture randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were found to be poor, with frequent use of spin to emphasize non-significant results. Journal policies could improve these reporting standards.
Area of Science:
- Integrative and Complementary Medicine
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Evidence-Based Healthcare
Background:
- Acupuncture randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for evaluating treatment efficacy.
- Ensuring high standards in reporting, data sharing, and unbiased interpretation of results is essential for reliable evidence.
- Previous assessments of reporting quality in medical RCTs highlight variability and areas for improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the reporting quality of acupuncture RCTs based on CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines.
- To assess the extent of data sharing practices in acupuncture RCTs according to ICMJE guidelines.
- To identify the frequency and level of "spin" used in reporting acupuncture RCTs, particularly for non-significant findings.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional meta-epidemiological study design was employed.
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, etc.) for studies published between January 2014 and May 2024.
- 476 peer-reviewed acupuncture RCTs using traditional medicine, with two parallel arms in humans, were assessed for reporting adherence, data sharing statements, and spin strategies.
Main Results:
- A significant proportion of the 476 evaluated acupuncture RCTs (65.5%) were poorly reported, with many items on the CONSORT and STRICTA checklists scoring below 50%.
- Data sharing compliance was low, with only 17.2% adhering to ICMJE guidelines, and a mere 1.5% providing open access data.
- Spin was prevalent, identified in 85.7% of studies, with 37.2% of those with non-significant primary outcomes exhibiting spin.
Conclusions:
- Acupuncture RCTs demonstrate low compliance with established reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STRICTA) and data sharing policies (ICMJE).
- The frequent use of spin in reporting non-significant results raises concerns about the unbiased presentation of evidence.
- Implementing stricter journal policies on reporting guidelines, data sharing, and balanced reporting of results is recommended to enhance the quality of acupuncture RCTs.
More Related Videos
05:39Acupoint Needle-Embedding Combined with Ironing Therapy for Postoperative Pain After Anal Surgery
Published on: June 23, 2023
07:29Author Spotlight: Development of a Standardized Acupuncture Tool Inspired by Advanced Techniques for Improved Safety and Precision
Published on: January 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Random Sampling Method
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks