Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation

DNA Isolation

DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

MatchY in practice: Factors influencing pedigree-based Y-STR match probabilities.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026

Same author

MatchY: A software implementation of pedigree-based calculation of Y-STR match probabilities.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026

Same author

The shared genetic architecture between acne vulgaris and inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-trait analysis.

The Journal of investigative dermatology·2026

Same author

The potential of low-field MRI for global dementia care.

Nature reviews. Neurology·2026

Same author

Novel Y-STRs with elevated mutation rates further improve male relative differentiation.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026

Same author

Bridging population and cell: modelling complex diseases with human induced pluripotent stem cells.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2025

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods.

Roy B Simons¹, Faidra Karkala¹, Marta M Kukk¹

¹Department of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Clinical Epigenetics

|April 4, 2025

Summary

Enzymatic conversion (EC) offers better DNA integrity than traditional bisulfite conversion (BC) for degraded samples, despite lower recovery rates. EC is more robust for sensitive applications with low-quality DNA.

Keywords:

Bisulfite conversion DNA methylation Enzymatic conversion Epigenetics Method comparison

More Related Videos

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Published on: July 12, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2025

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Published on: July 12, 2012

Area of Science:

Molecular Biology
Genetics
Biochemistry

Background:

Bisulfite conversion (BC) is the established method for DNA methylation profiling but requires high DNA input and causes fragmentation.
Enzymatic conversion (EC) kits offer an alternative, addressing BC's limitations with a two-step enzymatic process.
Sensitive applications often face challenges with low-quality DNA, necessitating improved conversion methods.

Purpose of the Study:

To validate and compare the performance of bisulfite conversion (BC) and enzymatic conversion (EC) kits.
To assess conversion efficiency, DNA recovery, and fragmentation using a multiplex qPCR assay (qBiCo).
To evaluate the suitability of BC and EC for degraded DNA samples.

Main Methods:

Standardization of both BC and EC DNA conversion protocols.
Developmental validation of both methods using qBiCo, testing repeatability, reproducibility, sensitivity, and robustness.
Analysis of conversion efficiency, DNA recovery, and fragmentation across various DNA inputs.

Main Results:

Both BC and EC showed similar conversion efficiency, with reproducible limits at 5 ng (BC) and 10 ng (EC).
EC demonstrated significantly lower DNA fragmentation (3.3 ± 0.4) compared to BC (14.4 ± 1.2) with degraded DNA.
BC overestimated DNA recovery (130%) while EC showed a lower, more accurate recovery (40%) in real-world sample testing.

Conclusions:

EC is more robust for analyzing degraded DNA samples, such as forensic or cell-free DNA, due to minimal fragmentation.
BC exhibits higher DNA recovery but causes significant fragmentation, limiting its use in sensitive applications.
Further optimization of EC's cleanup steps could improve its recovery rates, making it a superior alternative to BC for challenging samples.