Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

2.6K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
2.6K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.6K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.6K
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

829
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
829
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

72
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
72
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I01:27

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I

683
In healthcare, informed consent is a crucial process that involves thoroughly communicating medical treatment options to patients, including benefits, risks, potential side effects, and alternatives. This process enables patients to make well-informed decisions about their care, ensuring they understand the implications of their choices before consenting to or refusing treatment.
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
683
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

106
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
106

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leveraging Machine Learning and Robotic Process Automation to Identify and Convert Unstructured Colonoscopy Results Into Actionable Data: Proof-of-Concept Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2025
Same author

An exploration of delegation practices regarding the utilization of genetic counseling assistants for disclosure of genetic testing results.

Journal of genetic counseling·2025
Same author

Pathology-Driven Automation to Improve Updating Documented Follow-Up Recommendations in the Electronic Health Record After Colonoscopy.

Clinical and translational gastroenterology·2024
Same author

Legislating the Cause of Death: "What's in a Name …".

Journal of law and medicine·2024
Same author

BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers with breast, ovarian and prostate cancer demonstrate a different pattern of metastatic disease compared with non-carriers: results from a rapid autopsy programme.

Histopathology·2023
Same author

Independent Death Investigation - The Challenge: The Report to the United Nations Human Rights Council of the Special Rapporteur on Extra-judicial, Summary of Arbitrary Executions.

Journal of law and medicine·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2025

International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure
05:50

International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure

Published on: March 12, 2020

13.2K

AI and Expert Medical Evidence.

David Ranson1

  • 1Professor, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine. Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

Journal of Law and Medicine
|April 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used by experts, posing challenges for legal systems evaluating evidence. Distinguishing AI-assisted expert testimony from human expertise is crucial for fair legal processes.

Keywords:
artificial intelligenceblack boxdata privacydata securitydiagnostic imagingdiagnostic support toolsexpert evidenceexpert reportslarge language models (LLM)machine learning

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

406
Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
04:58

Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Published on: August 25, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2025

International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure
05:50

International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure

Published on: March 12, 2020

13.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

406
Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
04:58

Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Published on: August 25, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Legal Technology
  • Forensic Science
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Courts face challenges with the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in legal proceedings.
  • Expert witnesses increasingly rely on AI tools for investigations, analysis, and evidence presentation.
  • AI's analytical capabilities, including interpretation and diagnostics, present new hurdles for legal evaluation of expert testimony.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the challenges AI presents to legal systems in evaluating expert evidence.
  • To examine the distinction between human expertise and AI-assisted analysis in legal testimony.
  • To assess the implications of AI's increasing diagnostic accuracy in fields like medicine for legal scrutiny.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of AI applications in expert evidence.
  • Analysis of legal precedents concerning technology in court.
  • Case study examination of AI in medical diagnostics and legal challenges.

Main Results:

  • AI tools offer significant analytical value but complicate the assessment of expert evidence.
  • A key challenge is differentiating human expert opinion from AI-driven analysis.
  • Historical use of IT in medicine shows limited legal challenge, but rising AI accuracy may change this.

Conclusions:

  • The legal system must adapt to evaluate AI-influenced expert evidence.
  • Clearer guidelines are needed to distinguish between human and AI contributions to expert testimony.
  • Increased AI accuracy in diagnostics necessitates a re-evaluation of how expert evidence is admitted and challenged in court.