Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2025

Measurement of Chitinase Activity in Biological Samples
00:03

Measurement of Chitinase Activity in Biological Samples

Published on: August 22, 2019

10.1K

Chitin estimation in agricultural soils.

Alex Gobbi, Roberto Lava, Giorgia Vianello

    EFSA Journal. European Food Safety Authority
    |April 4, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same authorSame journal

    Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cymoxanil.

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    Same authorSame journal

    Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance bifenazate in light of confirmatory data submitted.

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    Same author

    Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance proquinazid.

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    Same author

    Improving metagenome binning by integrating intrinsic features and taxonomy.

    Nature biotechnology·2026
    Same author

    Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metyltetraprole.

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    Same author

    Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop-propargyl).

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    Same journal

    Safety evaluation of an extension of use of the food enzyme α-galactosidase from the genetically modified <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> strain CBS 615.94.

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    Same journal

    Safety evaluation of the food enzyme mannan endo-1,4-β-mannosidase from the non-genetically modified <i>Aspergillus niger</i>HBI-GM01.

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    Same journal

    Revised safety evaluation of the food enzyme triacylglycerol lipase from the non-genetically modified <i>Burkholderia stagnalis</i> strain PL266-QLM.

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    Same journal

    Multi-country outbreak of Salmonella Stanley ST2045 infections linked to consumption of flavoured noodle products. 1 July 2026.

    EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
    See all related articles

    This study estimated soil chitin levels, a precursor to chitosan, to assess its natural environmental availability. Fungi are the primary source, with soil chitin ranging from 27-280 kg/ha (0-5 cm) and 99-901 kg/ha (0-20 cm).

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Science
    • Soil Biology
    • Biochemistry

    Background:

    • Chitosan and chitosan hydrochloride are considered for plant protection uses as basic substances under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
    • Estimating the natural environmental availability of chitosan requires understanding the baseline levels of its precursor, chitin, in agricultural soils.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To estimate the amount of chitin present in agricultural soil.
    • To establish a baseline for the natural availability of chitin in soil.
    • To inform the estimation of chitosan potentially available in the environment.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review to gather data on chitin content in agricultural soils.
    • Estimation of chitin concentration in soil layers (0-5 cm and 0-20 cm).
    Keywords:
    agricultural soilbasic substancechitinchitosannatural occurrenceplant protection

    More Related Videos

    Preparation of Expanded Chitin Foams and their Use in the Removal of Aqueous Copper
    06:36

    Preparation of Expanded Chitin Foams and their Use in the Removal of Aqueous Copper

    Published on: February 27, 2021

    3.5K
    Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.
    07:32

    Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.

    Published on: June 4, 2021

    5.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 16, 2025

    Measurement of Chitinase Activity in Biological Samples
    00:03

    Measurement of Chitinase Activity in Biological Samples

    Published on: August 22, 2019

    10.1K
    Preparation of Expanded Chitin Foams and their Use in the Removal of Aqueous Copper
    06:36

    Preparation of Expanded Chitin Foams and their Use in the Removal of Aqueous Copper

    Published on: February 27, 2021

    3.5K
    Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.
    07:32

    Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.

    Published on: June 4, 2021

    5.0K
  • Development of a polynomial function to predict chitin content based on available data.
  • Main Results:

    • Estimated soil chitin content ranges from 27 to 280 kg/ha in the top 0-5 cm layer and 99 to 901 kg/ha in the 0-20 cm layer.
    • Fungi were identified as the primary producers of chitin in soil, followed by insects and nematodes.
    • A polynomial function was developed to estimate chitin amounts and identify key predictors in similar biomes.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides an initial estimate of soil chitin levels, crucial for assessing chitosan's environmental presence.
    • Further validation through field measurements across diverse soil types and conditions is necessary for a generalized model.
    • Identified data gaps and uncertainties require further investigation for robust environmental risk assessments.