Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Being the Best, or With the Best: A Developmental Examination of Children's Choices in a Social Comparison Dilemma
Hagit Sabato1, Tamar Cohen Steinberger2
1Division of Clinical Child and Educational Psychology, The Seymour Fox School of Education, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Isreal.
Abstract:
In two studies, we examined the decisions of children (aged 6-12 years old) when faced with the choice between two options in a social-comparison dilemma: to affiliate with a group in which they outperform all others (i.e., being the best), or with an advanced group, at the cost of losing their primacy (i.e., being with the best). Study 1 (N = 179, MAge = 8.90, 56.4% female) examined children's choice when presented with a two-option scenario; Study 2 (N = 211, MAge = 9.42, 50.7% female) examined the same decision following children's experience of an actual task, while manipulating the children's relative position before the decision (by priming them to imagine that they were the best at the task, compared with a control condition, without manipulation). Results revealed a consistent developmental pattern, such that with age children preferred to join a group of leading performers, even if it meant they would not be the best. We examine the children's reasons for their decision, and their implicit theories of ability as possible mechanisms behind this pattern.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Adler's Individual Psychology
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Childhood
The first four of Erikson's eight...

