Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Monitoring PD-1-Blocking Antibodies Bound to T Cells Derived from a Drop of Peripheral Blood
Published on: February 5, 2020
Lessons learned from a decade of immune checkpoint inhibition: The good, the bad, and the ugly
Jacob J Adashek1, Jillian A Moran2, Dung T Le3
1Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center1800 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. jadashek@westernu.edu.
Abstract:
Discovering the brakes/checkpoints that cancer places on the immune system to prevent being eradicated led to the 2018 Nobel Prize and the development of multiple Food and Drug Administration-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs have transformed the treatment of numerous cancer types and, remarkably, some patients with end-stage metastatic disease can achieve durable, complete remissions - cures. Still, ICIs cause significant immune-related toxicities, and most tumors are resistant. Unusual progression patterns such as pseudo-progression and hyper-progression (accelerated progression) can occur. Biomarkers for ICI response/resistance include microsatellite instability, high tumor mutational burden, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry positivity; but they are imperfect, perhaps because of immune system complexity. Herein, we explore the good, the bad, and the ugly of ICIs in cancer treatment.
Insights
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer cancer cures but cause toxicities and resistance. Research explores their benefits, drawbacks, and complex outcomes in cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Cancer Therapeutics
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are revolutionary cancer treatments, inspired by Nobel Prize-winning research on cancer's immune evasion mechanisms.
- ICIs have led to durable remissions, even cures, in some patients with advanced metastatic cancer.
- Despite successes, significant challenges remain, including immune-related toxicities and widespread tumor resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer therapy.
- To discuss the benefits, adverse effects, and resistance mechanisms associated with ICIs.
- To explore complex clinical progression patterns and current biomarker limitations for ICI response.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and synthesis of current research on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
- Analysis of clinical outcomes, including efficacy, toxicity, and progression patterns.
- Evaluation of existing biomarkers for predicting ICI response and resistance.
Main Results:
- ICIs have transformed treatment for many cancers, offering potential cures.
- Significant immune-related toxicities and tumor resistance limit ICI effectiveness.
- Unusual progression patterns like pseudo-progression and hyper-progression complicate treatment assessment.
- Current biomarkers (microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, PD-L1) are imperfect predictors of response.
Conclusions:
- ICIs represent a major advance in cancer immunotherapy, offering hope for durable responses.
- Addressing toxicity and overcoming resistance are critical for improving ICI therapy.
- Further research into the complex tumor-immune interactions is needed to refine patient selection and treatment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cytotoxic T Cells-mediated Immune Response
Immunological surveillance is the ability of immune cells to monitor and eliminate infected cells with intracellular pathogens, neoplastically transformed cells, and cells with non-self antigens. Cytotoxic T cells and NK...
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...

