Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2025

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

2.3K

Visagreement: Visualizing and Exploring Explanations (Dis)Agreement

Priscylla Silva, Vitoria Guardieiro, Brian Barr

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
    |April 4, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary

    Investigating disagreements between machine learning explanation methods is crucial. Visagreement, a new visualization tool, helps users understand when and why these explanations differ, improving trust in AI models.

    More Related Videos

    Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language09:27

    Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

    Published on: October 13, 2018

    9.8K
    Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline10:44

    Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

    Published on: December 7, 2021

    2.1K

    Related Concept Videos

    Variability: Analysis01:11

    Variability: Analysis

    Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
    The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
    116
    Cause and Effect01:53

    Cause and Effect

    While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
    10.8K
    Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

    Self-Discrepancy Theory

    One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
    18.2K
    Uncertainty: Overview00:59

    Uncertainty: Overview

    In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
    489
    Randomized Experiments01:13

    Randomized Experiments

    The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
    Simple randomization
    Simple...
    6.6K
    Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

    Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

    The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
    There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
    27.4K