Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published on: April 13, 2021
Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: A Rallying Cry for Critical Clinical Research and Ethical Thinking
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI) are transforming healthcare, but require independent research to ensure safe and effective clinical applications. Evidence-based validation is crucial for AI tools, especially for vulnerable patient groups and ethical patient-provider interactions.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)
Background:
- AI is poised to significantly impact various job sectors, including healthcare, necessitating careful implementation due to potential algorithmic biases and suboptimal patient treatment.
- While AI research in healthcare has historically focused on diagnostic radiology and digital pathology, emerging applications in radiation oncology require evidence of clinical utility beyond efficiency.
- Rapid advancements in Generative AI (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, present new possibilities and challenges in medical applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To advocate for independent academic research to establish evidence-based applications of AI in medicine.
- To highlight the critical need for understanding the strengths and limitations of AI tools in healthcare.
- To address the ethical considerations surrounding the integration of GenAI in patient care and the healthcare provider relationship.
Main Methods:
- Review of current AI applications in healthcare, with a focus on radiation oncology.
- Discussion of the potential impact of GenAI and LLMs on medical practice.
- Analysis of challenges including algorithmic bias, data representation, deskilling, and ethical boundaries.
Main Results:
- Existing AI applications in healthcare often lack robust evidence of clinical utility.
- GenAI, including LLMs, offers personalized and contextually relevant outputs but requires rigorous validation.
- Concerns exist regarding the potential for AI to exacerbate health disparities for under-represented minorities and rare cases.
Conclusions:
- Independent, evidence-based research is essential for the safe and effective implementation of AI in medicine, treating AI as a medical intervention.
- A significant educational effort is required for healthcare professionals to understand and critically assess AI tools.
- Ethical guidelines must be established to govern the use of GenAI in patient care, particularly concerning the patient-provider relationship.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Patient-centered Care
Critical Thinking II
Critical Thinking I
Current Trends in Nursing II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

