Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Evaluating the precision of computer adaptive testing in longitudinal hand surgery analyses: A psychometric approach
J S Teunissen1, Bepa van der Heijden2, J N Rodrigues3
1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Research, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
None:
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential in hand surgery for assessing patient health but it can be time-consuming. Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) offers a more efficient alternative by reducing the number of questions asked. This study sourced the data of 268 patients undergoing cubital tunnel release from the UK Hand Registry to evaluate whether CAT's inherent imprecision affects longitudinal research conclusions. Mean patient evaluation measure (PEM) scores at baseline, 2 months and 6 months from the traditional full-length assessment (10 questions) were compared with the simulated scores assuming that the CAT version (median of 2 questions) was used. Both methods showed significant improvements in PEM scores post-surgery (p < 0.01), with minimal differences between the mean scores and overlapping confidence intervals. These findings confirm that CAT replicates full-length PROM results while significantly reducing patient burden, thereby supporting its use in clinical and research settings for hand surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
