Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.6K
A validation study of the Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI)
Richard M Trosch1, Alicia C Shillington2, Cynthia L Comella3
1Oakland University William Beaumont Medical School, Rochester, MI, USA.
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
|April 5, 2025
Summary
The Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI) effectively measures tardive dyskinesia (TD) severity and functional impact, correlating well with existing scales. TD movement severity and functional impact are distinct, validating the CTI's comprehensive assessment approach.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Psychiatry
- Movement Disorders
Background:
- Existing clinician-rated scales for tardive dyskinesia (TD) lack comprehensive assessment of evolving clinical signs and functional impairments.
- The Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI) was developed by movement disorder specialists and psychiatrists to address these limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the construct validity of the newly developed Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI) for assessing TD.
- To evaluate the CTI's ability to capture both movement severity and functional impacts of TD.
Main Methods:
- Seventy patients with TD were assessed using both the CTI and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS).
- Construct validity was determined by correlating the CTI Combined Severity Score (CSS) with the AIMS dyskinesia score using Spearman rho.
- Exploratory analyses examined correlations between the CTI Functional Score and AIMS functional questions, as well as between CSS and CTI Functional Score.
Main Results:
- The CTI CSS demonstrated a high correlation with the AIMS dyskinesia score (rho = .770).
- The CTI Functional Score showed strong correlations with AIMS functional questions 9 (rho = .626) and 10 (rho = .771).
- Movement severity (CSS) and functional impact (CTI Functional Score) were not strongly correlated (rho = .285), aligning with clinical observations.
Conclusions:
- The CTI is a valid instrument for assessing TD, incorporating an updated understanding of its phenomenology.
- The CTI effectively differentiates between TD movement severity and its functional consequences.
- The study confirms that TD movement severity does not directly correlate with functional impairments, highlighting the need for distinct assessment domains.

