Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

25.9K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
25.9K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

7.9K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
7.9K
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

82.7K
Overview
82.7K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

27.4K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
27.4K
Incomplete Dominance01:43

Incomplete Dominance

20.5K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
20.5K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

38.5K
Overview
38.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A stage-resolved neuron-glia transcriptional atlas reveals a glial inflammatory pivot in epilepsy.

Acta neuropathologica communications·2026
Same author

Using all available evidence to solve kinship cases.

International journal of legal medicine·2026
Same author

Using autosomal and X-chromosomal SNPs to identify a victim of the 1956 Marcinelle mining disaster.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2025
Same author

EFMex: Using EuroForMix to evaluate DNA mixtures with multiple persons of interest.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2025
Same author

A crime case involving a mixture of three individuals solved using a sample from the daughter of the person of interest.

International journal of legal medicine·2025
Same author

Gene Expression Correlates with Disability and Pain Intensity in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Modic Changes in a Sex-Specific Manner.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same journal

Comparison of key diagnostics for probabilistic interpretation of STR mixture data generated with length-based and MPS methodologies.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Likelihood Ratios Given Activity-Level Propositions for DNA Transfer Evidence: Theoretical Foundations of the HaloGen Framework (Part I).

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Likelihood Ratios Given Activity-Level Propositions for DNA Transfer Evidence: Practical Implementation and Simulation Studies Using the HaloGen Engine (Part II).

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Forensic evaluation of 101 identity-informative SNPs in a Filipino population using massively parallel sequencing.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Reprocessing of hair roots using conventional forensic DNA analysis following RapidHIT® ID processing.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of low-input and degraded forensic DNA trace samples with NGS using the MiSeq FGx platform.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2025

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
08:39

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

7.5K

Kinship cases with partially specified hypotheses.

Thore Egeland1, Magnus Dehli Vigeland2

  • 1Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1433 Aas, Norway.

Forensic Science International. Genetics
|April 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic kinship testing uses a new generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) for complex cases. This method improves statistical comparisons in disaster victim identification and pedigree data validation.

Keywords:
Composite hypothesesDisaster victim identificationGeneralised likelihood ratioKinship testingPedigree analysis

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.1K
In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

20.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2025

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
08:39

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

7.5K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.1K
In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

20.6K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Forensic kinship testing statistically compares genetic data to hypothesize relationships.
  • Standard likelihood ratio (LR) calculations can be challenging with uncertain relationships or multiple possible pedigrees.
  • Complex scenarios, such as disaster victim identification (DVI), often involve incomplete familial information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) to address limitations in standard LR calculations for forensic kinship testing.
  • To explore the application and properties of the GLR in complex kinship scenarios, including DVI and pedigree data validation.

Main Methods:

  • Definition of the generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) as the ratio of maximal likelihoods for competing hypotheses.
  • Application of the GLR to discrete alternatives in forensic kinship testing and DVI.
  • Utilizing the GLR over a continuous parameter space for pedigree data correctness checks.

Main Results:

  • The GLR provides a robust method for statistical comparison in kinship testing, even with ambiguous pedigree information.
  • Demonstrated utility of the GLR in resolving and reporting results for complex disaster victim identification cases.
  • The GLR serves as an effective quality control tool for verifying pedigree data accuracy in genetic studies.

Conclusions:

  • The generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) offers a flexible and powerful statistical framework for forensic kinship analysis.
  • GLR enhances the ability to handle complex familial relationships and uncertain data in forensic investigations.
  • This statistical approach is valuable for both direct kinship determination and ensuring data integrity in genetic research.