Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

487
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
487
Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving01:30

Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving

589
A three-dimensional force system refers to a scenario in which three forces act simultaneously in three different directions. This type of problem is commonly encountered in physics and engineering, where it is necessary to calculate the resultant force on the system, which can then be used to predict or analyze the behavior of the object or structure under consideration.
To solve a three-dimensional force system, first resolve each force into its respective scalar components. Do this using...
589
Support Reactions in Three Dimensions01:27

Support Reactions in Three Dimensions

845
Support reactions in three dimensions help maintain the stability and equilibrium of various structures and systems. These reactions prevent the system from translating and rotating, ensuring the design can withstand external forces and perform its intended function efficiently and safely. Some of the supports providing support reactions in three dimensions are discussed below:
Ball and Socket Joint is one of the supports allowing free rotation about any axis. This freedom of rotation is...
845
Three-Dimensional Force System01:30

Three-Dimensional Force System

1.9K
In mechanical engineering, a three-dimensional force system is a system of forces acting in three dimensions, with forces applied along the x, y, and z coordinate axes. The three-dimensional force system is an important concept in mechanical engineering, as it allows engineers to understand and analyze the behavior of objects and structures in three dimensions. By understanding the forces acting on a system, engineers can design more efficient and effective mechanical systems that can withstand...
1.9K
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

3.5K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
3.5K
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

246
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
246

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic Sensorimotor Behavior Reveals Bayesian Belief Updating.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

When arrows behave like eyes: Reversal of spatial stroop interference by visual masking.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Selective attention in adults with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of task-specific differences and negative bias.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2026
Same author

Contextual cueing and attention control: Self-face vs. stranger-face search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Inhibition of Return in Three-Dimensional Space is Modulated by Depth and Object Membership.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Hemispheric asymmetry for visual information processing in 3D space.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

847

Distribution of attention in three-dimensional space.

Noah Britt1, Hanna Haponenko1, Brett A Cochrane2

  • 1McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Neuropsychologia
|April 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Spatial attention distribution in 3D space is task-dependent. A near advantage for attention was observed in target localization, while target discrimination showed a far advantage, challenging universal near-advantage theories.

Keywords:
3D spaceBehavioural urgencyFar advantageNear advantageSpatial cueingVisual pathways

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.8K
Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

847
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.8K
Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Spatial attention research primarily focuses on 2D space, with a common finding of a 'near advantage' for stimuli closer to the observer.
  • However, evidence suggests this near advantage might be task-specific, with some tasks favoring stimuli in far space.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether different attentional priorities, specifically target localization versus target discrimination, influence the distribution of spatial attention across near and far depths in 3D space.
  • To determine if the 'near advantage' in spatial attention is universally applicable or task-dependent.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using both single-target and cue-target paradigms.
  • Participants performed either target localization or target discrimination tasks at varying depths (near vs. far).
  • Reaction times (RTs) and cueing effects were analyzed to assess attentional biases.

Main Results:

  • Target localization tasks showed shorter RTs for near targets compared to far targets (near advantage).
  • Target discrimination tasks exhibited shorter RTs for far targets compared to near targets (far advantage).
  • Cue-target paradigms confirmed these task-specific biases, showing differential facilitation when shifting attention between near and far depths.

Conclusions:

  • The findings argue against a universal near advantage in spatial attention.
  • Different task demands significantly bias the distribution of attention across near and far depth.
  • These results have implications for understanding the roles of dorsal and ventral visual processing streams in attention.