Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Precision Measurements and Parametric Models of Vertebral Endplates
Published on: September 17, 2019
Automated Analysis of Surface Roughness and Waviness in Vertebral Bodies by Computed Tomography: Implications for
Seth M Meade1, Gabrielle Scariano2, Michael Shost3
1Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Objective:
The interactions between interbody devices, corpectomy cages, and vertebral bodies are influenced by surface characteristics such as roughness and waviness, impacting fusion quality and patient outcomes. Understanding vertebral surface morphology is crucial for improving cage design and avoiding complications like subsidence, neural injury, and reoperation. This study aims to characterize the variability in vertebral morphology along the spine.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of a spinal computed tomography (CT) scan database of 159 patients (mean age 59 ± 17) from an open-source database, encompassing 1895 vertebral bodies, was performed. Vertebral morphology was analyzed using an automated pipeline and clustered based on roughness and waviness to identify unique morphologic subgroups.
Results:
Mean surface roughness (MSR) was highest in the cervical, upper thoracic, and lower lumbar spine, while mean surface waviness (MSW) peaked in the lower lumbar spine. Clustering revealed heterogeneous subgroups below C6, while the upper cervical spine had more homogeneous morphology (high roughness, low waviness). MSR and MSW were negatively correlated with sagittal slope at C3-6 and C7-T1. MSR was positively correlated with sagittal slope at T2-T11 and L4-L5, while MSW was positively correlated from T12-L3.
Conclusions:
This study presents an automated method to measure MSR and MSW of spinal vertebral bodies. These parameters could aid in simulating the interaction between interbody devices and vertebral bodies preoperatively to allow for optimization of device design to enhance osseous integration. Future work will explore the relationship between these measures and clinical outcomes, particularly fusion quality.
More Related Videos
07:12Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
Published on: September 28, 2017
09:29Author Spotlight: Improving Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Surgical Accuracy and Efficiency Through Advanced Puncture Techniques
Published on: August 9, 2024