Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The value of joint peer review between early career researchers and supervisors
Viviana Macarelli1, Florian T Merkle2
1Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Abstract:
Peer review is essential for maintaining the quality of published research, but this skill is often not explicitly taught to early career researchers (ECRs). Joint peer review with supervisors can both promote ECR professional growth and enhance review quality. We describe the advantages and best practices of joint peer review.
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Feedback Loops
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Proofreading
Joints
Structural joint classifications are based on the material that makes up the joint as well as whether or not the joint contains a space between the bones. Joints are structurally classified as fibrous, cartilaginous, or synovial.
Fibrous Joints Are Immovable
The bones of a...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

