Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioremediation00:46

Bioremediation

18.1K
Bioremediation is the use of prokaryotes, fungi, or plants to remove pollutants from the environment. This process has been used to remove harmful toxins in groundwater as a byproduct of agricultural run-off and also to clean up oil spills.
18.1K
The Carbon Cycle01:14

The Carbon Cycle

36.7K
Carbon is the basis of all organic matter on Earth, and is recycled through the ecosystem in two primary processes: one in which carbon is exchanged among living organisms, and one in which carbon is cycled over long periods of time through fossilized organic remains, weathering of rocks, and volcanic activity. Human activities, including increased agricultural practices and the burning of fossil fuels, has greatly affected the balance of the natural carbon cycle.
36.7K
The Calvin Benson Cycle01:46

The Calvin Benson Cycle

4.4K
Ribulose 1,5- bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCo) is a critical enzyme that catalyzes carbon dioxide assimilation during photosynthesis. However, it is an inefficient enzyme, having an extremely slow catalytic rate. A typical enzyme can process about a thousand molecules per second; however, RuBisCo fixes only around three-carbon dioxides per second. Photosynthetic cells compensate for this slow rate by synthesizing very high amounts of RuBisCo, making it the most abundant single...
4.4K
C4 Pathway and CAM01:27

C4 Pathway and CAM

45.0K
Most plants use the C3 pathway for carbon fixation. However, some plants, such as sugar cane, corn, and cacti that grow in hot conditions, use alternative pathways to fix carbon and conserve energy loss due to photorespiration. Photorespiration is the process that occurs when the oxygen concentration is high. Under such conditions, the rubisco enzyme in the Calvin cycle binds O2 instead of CO2, which halts photosynthesis and consumes energy.
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...
45.0K
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss01:57

Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss

25.0K
Though evaporation from plant leaves drives transpiration, it also results in loss of water. Because water is critical for photosynthetic reactions and other cellular processes, evolutionary pressures on plants in different environments have driven the acquisition of adaptations that reduce water loss.
25.0K
The Calvin Cycle01:40

The Calvin Cycle

73.2K
Overview
73.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards an understanding of the impact of micro- and macro-manifestations of religiosity on climate change risk perception: a cross-national study.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Exploring global climate intervention experiments: sociotechnical promises, innovation dynamics, and perceived co-impacts across 20 projects and pilots.

Sustainability science·2025
Same author

Carbon removal support is tempered by concerns over whether biological methods are worth it.

Communications earth & environment·2025
Same author

A new hope or phantom menace? Exploring climate emotions and public support for climate interventions across 30 countries.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025
Same author

Demographics shape public preferences for carbon dioxide removal and solar geoengineering interventions across 30 countries.

Communications earth & environment·2024
Same author

Like diamonds in the sky? Public perceptions, governance, and information framing of solar geoengineering activities in Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Environmental politics·2024
Same journal

Single-cell ionomes of terrestrial cryosphere algae.

Communications earth & environment·2026
Same journal

Gatekeeper wetlands govern nutrient pathways in a continental basin.

Communications earth & environment·2026
Same journal

Hotspots of Arctic and sub-Arctic marine sediment organic carbon are dominated by the Baltic, Barents and Chukchi Seas.

Communications earth & environment·2026
Same journal

Impact attribution of the March 2022 Antarctic heatwave reveals amplification by cloud feedbacks and increased future meltwater.

Communications earth & environment·2026
Same journal

A long-lived impact-generated hydrothermal system at the Chicxulub impact structure.

Communications earth & environment·2026
Same journal

Marine plastic pollution undermines the livelihoods and income of fishing communities in Viet Nam.

Communications earth & environment·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry
07:27

Author Spotlight: On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry

Published on: January 5, 2024

2.4K

Carbon removal beyond the trees.

Emily Cox1,2, Sean Low3,4, Chad M Baum3

  • 1Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Communications Earth & Environment
|April 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Tree planting for carbon sequestration is popular, but this bias may negatively affect perceptions of other carbon removal techniques. This preference could hinder the development of diverse and effective carbon removal strategies.

Keywords:
Carbon and energyGeographyPsychology

More Related Videos

Transformation of Organic Household Leftovers into a Peat Substitute
08:43

Transformation of Organic Household Leftovers into a Peat Substitute

Published on: July 9, 2019

8.2K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Place-Based Biochar Production for Ecosystem Restoration and Soil Health
03:42

Author Spotlight: Advancing Place-Based Biochar Production for Ecosystem Restoration and Soil Health

Published on: April 5, 2024

790

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry
07:27

Author Spotlight: On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry

Published on: January 5, 2024

2.4K
Transformation of Organic Household Leftovers into a Peat Substitute
08:43

Transformation of Organic Household Leftovers into a Peat Substitute

Published on: July 9, 2019

8.2K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Place-Based Biochar Production for Ecosystem Restoration and Soil Health
03:42

Author Spotlight: Advancing Place-Based Biochar Production for Ecosystem Restoration and Soil Health

Published on: April 5, 2024

790

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Climate Change Mitigation
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Carbon sequestration through tree planting is a widely recognized climate change solution.
  • Public perception and biases can significantly influence the adoption of environmental technologies.
  • A diverse portfolio of carbon removal strategies is crucial for effective climate action.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of the popularity of tree planting on the perception of alternative carbon removal methods.
  • To identify potential biases in public opinion regarding carbon removal techniques.
  • To understand how these biases might affect the development of a comprehensive carbon removal strategy.

Main Methods:

  • Survey-based experiment presenting participants with various carbon removal options.
  • Analysis of participant preferences and stated biases towards different techniques.
  • Statistical evaluation of the influence of tree planting's popularity on the evaluation of other methods.

Main Results:

  • Participants showed a significant bias favoring tree planting over other carbon removal options.
  • The popularity of tree planting led to more negative evaluations of alternative techniques.
  • This bias was observed even when alternative methods were presented with comparable or superior carbon sequestration potential.

Conclusions:

  • The strong public preference for tree planting may create a "halo effect" that disadvantages other vital carbon removal technologies.
  • This bias poses a risk to the development of a balanced and effective portfolio of climate solutions.
  • Further research is needed to understand and mitigate these perceptual biases for robust climate change mitigation efforts.