Effectiveness of coronary sinus reducer implantation in routine clinical practice: 12-month outcomes

Szymon Włodarczak1, Piotr Rola2,3, Artur Jastrzębski4

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Copper Health Centre, Lubin, Poland. wlodarczak.szy@gmail.com

Insights

Coronary sinus reducer (CSR) implantation effectively treats refractory angina (RA) patients, improving symptoms and quality of life. One-year follow-up showed no adverse effects, indicating CSR is a safe and viable therapeutic option.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Refractory angina (RA) presents a significant challenge due to limited therapeutic options.
  • Coronary sinus reducer (CSR) is a novel device for advanced coronary artery disease.
  • Real-world clinical data on CSR efficacy are currently scarce.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the 12-month efficacy and safety of coronary sinus reducer (CSR) implantation in patients with refractory angina (RA).
  • To assess changes in angina severity, exercise tolerance, and quality of life following CSR implantation.

Main Methods:

  • The Lower Silesia Sinus Reducer Registry (NCT06288165) included 67 patients with chronic RA (CCS classes 2-4) receiving CSR.
  • Primary endpoints included changes in angina severity (CCS class, SAQ-7), safety, exercise tolerance (6MWD), and quality of life (SF-36, EQ-5D VAS).

Main Results:

  • 86.6% of patients experienced at least a one-class improvement in CCS class after 12 months (P <0.001).
  • Significant improvements were observed in angina control (SAQ-7 score, P <0.001), quality of life (SF-36 score, P <0.001), and exercise tolerance (6MWD, P = 0.03).

Conclusions:

  • CSR implantation is an effective treatment for patients suffering from refractory angina.
  • One-year follow-up data indicate no long-term adverse effects associated with CSR device implantation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos