Phantom-based evaluation of image quality in Transformer-enhanced 2048-matrix CT imaging at low and ultralow doses

To compare the quality of standard 512-matrix, standard 1024-matrix, and Swin2SR-based 2048-matrix phantom images under different scanning protocols.

The Catphan 600 phantom was scanned using a multidetector CT scanner under two protocols: 120 kV/100 mA (CT dose index volume = 3.4 mGy) to simulate low-dose CT, and 70 kV/40 mA (0.27 mGy) to simulate ultralow-dose CT. Raw data were reconstructed into standard 512-matrix images using three methods: filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction at 40% intensity (ASIR-V), and deep learning image reconstruction at high intensity (DLIR-H). The Swin2SR super-resolution model was used to generate 2048-matrix images (Swin2SR-2048), while the super-resolution convolutional neural network (SRCNN) model generated 2048-matrix images (SRCNN-2048). The quality of 2048-matrix images generated by the two models (Swin2SR and SRCNN) was compared. Image quality was evaluated by ImQuest software (v7.2.0.0, Duke University) based on line pair clarity, task-based transfer function (TTF), image noise, and noise power spectrum (NPS).

At equivalent radiation doses and reconstruction method, Swin2SR-2048 images identified more line pairs than both standard-512 and standard-1024 images. Except for the 0.27 mGy/DLIR-H/standard kernel sequence, TTF-50% of Teflon increased after super-resolution processing. Statistically significant differences in TTF-50% were observed between the standard 512, 1024, and Swin2SR-2048 images (all p < 0.05). Swin2SR-2048 images exhibited lower image noise and NPS_peak compared to both standard 512- and 1024-matrix images, with significant differences observed in all three matrix types (all p < 0.05). Swin2SR-2048 images also demonstrated superior quality compared to SRCNN-2048, with significant differences in image noise (p < 0.001), NPS_peak (p < 0.05), and TTF-50% for Teflon (p < 0.05).

Transformer-enhanced 2048-matrix CT images improve spatial resolution and reduce image noise compared to standard-512 and -1024 matrix images.