Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

4.6K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AI assists adversarial collaboration in debate on minority salience.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Past and present goals are represented concurrently during visual search.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Imaging the spatiotemporal dynamics of covert attention with a pupillometric probing paradigm.

iScience·2026
Same author

Pupil Size Reflects Trial-Level Variability in Imagery Vividness During Immersive Storytelling but Not (or Hardly) Individual Differences in Trait Imagery.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Pupil size correlates with near-threshold detection performance irrespective of stimulus color, eccentricity, or retinal adaptation state.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Frequency-dependent modulation of foveal contrast sensitivity by fine-scale exogenously triggered attention.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Estimating probabilities of malaria importation in southern Mozambique through modelling <i>P. falciparum</i> genomics and mobility patterns.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Conformational variability of HIV-1 Env trimer and viral vulnerability.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Disinformation elicits learning biases.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Correction: Generation of a transparent killifish line through multiplex CRISPR/Cas9mediated gene inactivation.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Differential regulation of hepatic macrophage fate by Chi3l1 in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

eLife·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.0K

Effort drives saccade selection.

Damian Koevoet1, Laura Van Zantwijk1, Marnix Naber1

  • 1Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Elife
|April 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Eye movements are guided by minimizing effort. The brain prioritizes saccade directions with lower "saccade costs," adapting this behavior based on cognitive demand and search tasks.

Keywords:
costdecision-makingefforthumanhumansneurosciencepupil sizesaccade selection

More Related Videos

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

7.4K
Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.0K
Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

7.4K
Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Pupil size is a known indicator of cognitive effort.
  • Previous research established pupil size as a marker for saccade effort ('saccade costs').

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if 'saccade costs' critically influence saccade selection.
  • To determine if this principle applies during complex visual search tasks.
  • To examine how changing cognitive demand affects saccade behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Participants chose between saccade directions with varying associated costs.
  • Eye movements were tracked during search in natural scenes.
  • Cognitive demand was manipulated using an auditory counting task.

Main Results:

  • The direction with the least 'saccade cost' was consistently preferred.
  • This preference held true even during natural scene search.
  • Increased cognitive load reduced saccade frequency and particularly costly saccades.

Conclusions:

  • Saccade costs are a primary driver of eye movement selection.
  • The eye-movement system flexibly allocates resources with other cognitive functions.
  • Eye movement behavior is optimized to minimize inherent effort.