Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.

Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records

Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records

Source-oriented records, or SOR, are medical record-keeping organized by the data source. The SOR system was first developed in the mid-1900s to organize the growing patient data in hospitals and other healthcare facilities.
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

Introduction to Documentation and Reporting

Introduction to Documentation and Reporting

Documentation is the systematic process of formally recording, maintaining, and communicating information.
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Temporal Trends in the Use of Healthcare Services for Respiratory Infections in the Paediatric Population of Anoia (2017-2024): Primary and Hospital Care.

Viruses·2026

Same author

First exposure to SARS-CoV-2 shapes IgG subclass switching after mRNA vaccination.

Communications medicine·2026

Same author

Workplace violence and psychosocial risks exposures: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

BMC public health·2026

Same author

Evaluating Patient and Professional Satisfaction and Documentation Time Reduction Through AI-Driven Automatic Clinical Note Generation in Primary Care: Proof-of-Concept Study.

JMIR AI·2026

Same author

Virtual reality as a pain reduction method in burn and wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Burns & trauma·2026

Same author

Feasibility, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Satisfaction of an Acute Pediatric Video Interconsultation Model in Rural Primary Care in Catalonia: Prospective Observational Study.

JMIR pediatrics and parenting·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Assessing Patient-Reported Satisfaction With Care and Documentation Time in Primary Care Through AI-Driven Automatic

Josep Vidal-Alaball^1,2,3, Carlos Alonso⁴, Daniel Hugo Heinisch⁴

¹Research and Innovation Unit, Gerència d'Atenció Primària i a la Comunitat de la Catalunya Central, Institut Català de la Salut, Manresa, Spain.

JMIR Research Protocols

|April 7, 2025

Summary

This study evaluates Relisten, an AI tool enhancing patient care by automating clinical documentation. Early results suggest improved patient satisfaction and significant time savings for healthcare professionals in primary care settings.

Keywords:

artificial intelligence computerized medical records systems patient satisfaction patient-centered care primary health care

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients

Published on: July 12, 2024

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients

Published on: July 12, 2024

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

Area of Science:

Medical Informatics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Clinical Documentation Improvement

Background:

Relisten, an AI software by Recog Analytics, streamlines patient care by enabling natural clinician-patient interactions.
It extracts and structures information from recorded conversations for electronic health records, reducing administrative burden.
This allows healthcare professionals to focus more on patient interaction rather than documentation.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate patient-reported satisfaction and perceived quality of care with AI-assisted documentation.
To assess healthcare professionals' satisfaction with the care provided using the AI tool.
To measure the time efficiency of electronic medical record (EMR) data entry with the AI solution.

Main Methods:

A multicenter, proof-of-concept (PoC) trial involving nurses and physicians in primary care centers (CAPs).
Outcome measures include patient-reported quality of care (surveys), clinician satisfaction (surveys, interviews), and documentation time savings (manual vs. AI-generated notes).
Statistical analyses utilize independent sample comparison tests, with normality assessed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Lilliefors tests, and stratified tests for inter-professional variance.

Main Results:

Protocol developed following SPIRIT checklist; recruitment initiated July 2024.
As of November 2024, 318 patients enrolled; full recruitment expected by March 2025.
Data analysis scheduled for April-May 2025, with results anticipated in June 2025.

Conclusions:

Anticipated improvement in patient-perceived quality of care.
Expected significant reduction in clinical note-taking time, aiming for at least 30 seconds saved per visit.
While high note quality is expected, demonstrating significant superiority over existing high-quality control notes remains uncertain.