Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

106
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
106
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

72
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
72
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

70
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
70
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

85
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
85
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

97
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
97
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reporting Interest-Holder Engagement in Practice Guidelines: The RIGHT-MuSE Checklist.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing the trustworthiness of health guidelines recommendations: the transparent, rigorous, useable, standardized, and trustworthy guide (TRUSTGUIDES) tools development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Highlighting Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency of Research in an Academic CV.

Clinical and translational science·2026
Same author

Examining the Relevance of Gait Speed Resiliencies to Different Stressors: the ARIC Study.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2026
Same author

Back in Circulation: A Review of the Implementation of Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Donation After Circulatory Death in Lung Transplantation.

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation·2026
Same author

Associations of blood biomarkers of glial cell dysfunction and neuronal injury with future cognitive decline and incident dementia.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same journal

Correction to I.M. Matters News: Sleep medicine for seniors.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Adverse Events After Same-Day COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Versus Influenza Vaccination Alone : A Target Trial Emulation.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Leveraging Real-World Evidence to Inform Regulatory, Clinical, and Coverage Decisions Related to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Methodological Approaches to Real-World Evidence Generation for Glucagon-like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Weekly and Biweekly Treatment With Bofanglutide Versus Semaglutide in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes : A Phase 2b Randomized Clinical Trial.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Grappling with GLP-1 prescribing.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Standardization and Prediction to Control Confounding: Estimating Risk Differences and Ratios for Clinical

A Russell Localio1, James A Henegan2, Stephanie Chang3

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.R.L.).

Annals of Internal Medicine
|April 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating health risks like death from smoking requires clear metrics. Standardization in statistical modeling provides transparent risk estimates, overcoming limitations of odds ratios often misinterpreted in biomedical research.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Logistic regression is common for biomedical risk questions.
  • Odds ratios are frequently misunderstood, hindering clear interpretation.
  • Standard statistical models have limitations for causal inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review standardization concepts and link them to regression modeling for causal inference.
  • To compare weighting and matching approaches with regression-based standardization.
  • To demonstrate clinically meaningful risk estimation using standardization.

Main Methods:

  • Review of classical standardization concepts.
  • Application of standardization through modeling, weighting, and matching.
  • Use of logistic regression and other statistical models for causal inference.
  • Example analysis using smoking data from the ARIC study.

Main Results:

  • Standardization offers a solution to methodological shortcomings in typical regression analyses.
  • Clinically interpretable risk differences and ratios can be estimated using standardization.
  • Standard statistical software can re-express results in meaningful metrics.

Conclusions:

  • Standardization is valuable for estimating risks, differences, and ratios for binary outcomes.
  • Regression modeling combined with standardization enhances causal inference.
  • This approach improves the transparency and clinical utility of risk assessment in health research.