Injury, child and family factors predict neurodevelopment outcomes after abusive head trauma

Amy K Connery1, William A Anastasiadis1, Daniel M Lindberg2

  • 1Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.

Child Abuse & Neglect
|April 7, 2025
PubMed

Insights

A constellation of injury variables, particularly hospital course measures, better predicts neurodevelopmental outcomes in abusive head trauma (AHT) survivors than the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone. Child and family factors further improved prediction accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric neurology
  • Neurodevelopmental outcomes
  • Abusive head trauma research

Background:

  • Lack of consensus exists on optimal methods for measuring injury severity in abusive head trauma (AHT).
  • Predicting long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in AHT survivors remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that a combination of injury-related, child, and family variables more accurately predicts neurodevelopmental outcomes in AHT-affected children than the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone.

Main Methods:

  • 270 AHT survivors (median age 4.6 months) treated between 2012-2020 at a tertiary children's hospital were enrolled.
  • Exploratory analyses identified relationships between injury severity, child/family variables, and neurodevelopmental outcomes (Bayley Scales).
  • Stepwise multivariate regressions were used to predict outcomes based on selected variables.

Main Results:

  • Injury variables, including cytotoxic edema, ICU length of stay, neurosurgery, seizures, intubation, eye, and spine injuries, explained 14-22% more variance in Bayley scores than GCS alone.
  • Hospital course measures (ICU stay, neurosurgery, seizures, intubation) demonstrated the largest effect sizes.
  • Inclusion of child and family variables added an additional 6-10% to the explained variance in outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive set of injury-related variables, especially those reflecting hospital course, is a more potent predictor of neurodevelopmental outcomes in AHT cases than GCS alone.
  • Integrating child and family factors further enhances the predictive accuracy for long-term outcomes in AHT survivors.
Abstract