Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
The development and evaluation of polygenic risk score reports: A systematized review of the literature
Mia Hanley1, Sharne Limb2, Rebecca Purvis2
1Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Insights
Polygenic risk scores (PGS) are nearing clinical use, but clear reporting guidelines are lacking. Research suggests using absolute risk and avoiding stigmatizing colors for effective communication of genetic risk scores.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Polygenic risk scores (PGS) are increasingly evaluated for clinical utility.
- Anticipated integration of PGS into clinical practice necessitates clear reporting guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and analyze existing literature on the development and evaluation of tools for communicating PGS results.
- To identify best practices for presenting PGS in clinical reports, visual aids, and online platforms.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of research studies evaluating the understanding and interpretation of PGS.
- Inclusion of studies assessing reports, visual aids, and online tools for PGS communication.
- Searches conducted in MEDLINE and APA PsychInfo databases.
Main Results:
- Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing diverse methods for presenting PGS.
- Visual presentations included icon arrays and bell curves; numerical presentations used absolute risk, relative risk, and genetic risk scores.
- Participant understanding varied; studies favored absolute risk communication and recommended avoiding stigmatizing colors.
Conclusions:
- An evidence-based approach to PGS reporting is crucial for successful clinical implementation.
- Development and evaluation of PGS reports involving consumers and healthcare professionals are needed.
Purpose:
The return of polygenic risk scores (PGS) is currently being assessed in research settings for clinical utility and validity, and it is anticipated that PGS will soon be implemented in a clinical setting. There are limited guidelines regarding PGS communication and reporting; thus, there is a need to identify and analyze the current research to determine the most acceptable means of presenting PGS results through reports. The aim of this review is to examine the literature regarding the development and evaluation of PGS communication tools, including risk reports, visual aids, and online tools.
Methods:
Research studies that evaluated preferences, understanding or interpretation of PGS through a report, visual aid, or tool were included. The search strategy was applied to MEDLINE (via Ovid) and American Psychological Association PsychInfo.
Results:
Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The presentation of PGS differed across studies, including icon arrays and bell curves for visual presentation and absolute risk, relative risk, and genetic risk score for numerical presentation. Participants' understanding of PGS differed between studies. Studies supported using absolute risk and avoiding stigmatizing colors to communicate results.
Conclusion:
To support PGS clinical implementation, the development of an evidence-based PGS report evaluated by consumers and various health care professionals is needed.
More Related Videos
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
09:38Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Polygenic Traits
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Pleiotropy
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...