Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
Published on: May 8, 2014
Characterizing the interaction effects of modular components on transtibial prosthesis stance-phase mechanical
Seth Donahue1, Miguel Vaca2,3, Wendy A Beattie1
1Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Adding modular components to dynamic response prosthetic feet alters mechanical behavior, impacting energy return and displacement. Clinicians can use these insights to optimize prosthetic tuning for user comfort and performance.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Prosthetics Engineering
- Materials Science
Background:
- Limited data exists on mechanical interactions between prosthetic feet and proximal components.
- Prosthetic mechanical properties significantly influence user experience.
Purpose of the Study:
- Quantify the stance phase mechanical behavior of a transtibial prosthetic system.
- Investigate the effects of adding passive modular components to a dynamic response (DR) foot.
Main Methods:
- Mechanical characterization using a materials test machine and a test rig.
- Tested 12 conditions combining a DR foot with hydraulic ankles and shock-absorbing pylons (SAPs) at different settings.
- Measured maximum displacement, energy return, and roll-over shape during simulated stance phases.
Main Results:
- Modular components independently and interactively affected displacement and energy return.
- Hydraulic ankles and SAPs generally reduced energy return but altered displacement.
- Roll-over shape exhibited nonlinear responses with the addition of modular components.
Conclusions:
- Modular components introduce complex mechanical interactions affecting prosthetic system response.
- Clinicians should understand these cumulative effects for effective prosthetic tuning.
- Combinations of hydraulic ankles and SAPs aid in balancing user comfort and energy return.
More Related Videos
11:16Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
Published on: July 22, 2014
06:58A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
Published on: November 6, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
Ankle Joint
Anatomical Movements
Here are some common anatomical movements:
Flexion and extension motions are in the sagittal (anterior–posterior) plane of motion. These movements take place at the shoulder, hip, elbow, knee, wrist, metacarpophalangeal,...
One-Degree-of-Freedom System
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...