Patients with AML and an IDH2-R172 mutation exhibit a unique initial response to intensive chemotherapy induction

Meira Yisraeli Salman1,2, Alexander R Terry1, Andriy Derkach1

  • 1Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Blood Advances
|April 8, 2025
PubMed

The utility of a midcycle bone marrow biopsy (BMB) for early assessment of response in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after intensive chemotherapy (IC) induction is contested. Even when challenged, there is little consideration as to the possibility of different response dynamics among genetically defined subgroups. Clinical observations led to the hypothesis that patients with AML and mutations in IDH2-R172 (R172-m) exhibit particularly slow blast reduction after IC induction. The purpose of this study was to analyze response kinetics of patients with R172-m to IC and compare the dynamics to patients with AML and IDH2-R140 mutations (R140-m). A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted among patients with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutated AML who received IC induction. Dynamics of blast reduction were compared and correlated with outcomes. A total of 52 patients were identified; 33 with R140-m and 19 with R172-m. Patients with R172-m had significantly higher midcycle BMB median blast count (70% vs 5%; P < .001), and their BMBs were slightly more cellular (P = .045). Among the R140-m, 58% had ≤5% blasts vs 0 of the R172-m. Furthermore, it took significantly longer for patients with R172-m to achieve blast clearance (≤5% blasts in BMB) compared to those with R140-m (P = .017). However, there was no difference in overall survival between the 2 groups, and outcomes were similar and favorable. This type of slow blast reduction has only previously been described in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. These findings suggest judicial application of reinduction strategies in this subgroup and warrant further investigation.

Related Concept Videos

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
4.8K
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.2K
Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
7.4K