Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Cross-sectional Study and Comparison between Japan and the United States on Special Regulatory Pathways for Expedited
Kojiro Kobayashi1,2, Yuina Inaba3,4, Mayu Hashimoto3
1Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
Investigations on the relationship between the designated systems for drug development and regulatory processes in Japan and those in the United States over an extended period of time are limited.
Objectives:
We aimed to comprehensively investigate the special regulatory pathways for approved drugs in Japan focusing on the types of drugs receiving SRPs, the benefits of SRP in terms of review periods, a comparison between Japan and the United States, and the investigation of mutual influences in obtaining SRPs in both countries over 20 years.
Methods:
All drugs approved in Japan between September 1999 and December 2022, and those that underwent various special regulations based on publicly available information were investigated. A comparison between Japan and the United States was conducted using publicly available information.
Results:
In total, 2,309 drugs were approved in Japan between September1999 and December 2022, of which 819 drugs received special regulatory pathways. The number of drugs receiving special regulatory pathways increased annually, from 10 from September to December in 1999 to 90 in 2022. Anticancer drugs accounted for one-third of all drugs. Orphan drugs (432 drugs, 52.7%), expedited reviews (257 drugs, 31.4%), and priority reviews (135 drugs, 16.5%) were the most common regulatory pathways. For drugs receiving special regulatory pathways, 315 (38.5%) were approved within 6 months and 699 (85.3%) were approved within 12 months (the mean review period in Japan). Designations of priority review, expedited review, and orphan drug in Japan mutually influence the designation of these special regulatory pathways. In addition, designation of expedited review and orphan drug in Japan was influenced by designation of breakthrough therapy in the US, and expedited review in Japan was influenced by fast track in the US. In the US, special regulatory pathways are not significantly overlapped each other in the US.
Conclusions:
In the drugs approved in Japan, the Japanese specific special regulatory pathways are mutually influenced. Expedited review and orphan drug in Japan are significantly impacted by the specific special regulatory pathways of the US. Additionally, special regulatory pathways of the US did not influence each other.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Preclinical Development: Overview
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...

