Indigenous Knowledge as a sole data source in habitat selection functions
Rowenna Gryba1,2,3, Andrew Von Duyke4, Henry P Huntington5
1Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, British Columbia, Canada.
Summary
Indigenous Knowledge (IK) statistically characterizes species-habitat relationships, informing conservation and management. This approach, including dynamic habitats, identifies critical areas for species like ringed seals, supporting Indigenous communities.
Area of Science:
- Conservation Biology
- Wildlife Management
- Ethnoecology
Background:
- Western species-habitat models often exclude Indigenous Knowledge (IK), potentially impacting Indigenous communities and species conservation.
- Exclusion of IK in management can lead to limited access to culturally and subsistencely important species.
- There is a need to integrate IK into scientific frameworks for effective species management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop statistical methods for characterizing Indigenous Knowledge (IK) of species-habitat relationships.
- To create species-habitat models that solely utilize IK to identify important habitats and species use areas.
- To demonstrate the application of these methods for dynamic habitat types and species management.
Main Methods:
- Developed statistical techniques to characterize Indigenous Knowledge (IK) regarding species-habitat associations.
- Created species-habitat models based exclusively on documented IK, including dynamic habitat variables like ice concentration.
- Applied the methodology to ringed seals in Alaskan waters, incorporating Iñupiat hunters' knowledge.
Main Results:
- Successfully developed and applied methods to statistically model species-habitat relationships using Indigenous Knowledge (IK).
- Identified important habitats and areas of species use for ringed seals based solely on IK.
- Demonstrated that IK, especially with dynamic habitat considerations, enhances existing mapping and identification approaches.
Conclusions:
- Indigenous Knowledge (IK) provides a valuable and statistically characterizable dataset for species-habitat modeling.
- Integrating IK, including dynamic habitat types, offers a robust method for identifying critical species habitats.
- This approach facilitates meaningful inclusion of IK in species management and co-management initiatives.
Related Concept Videos
Habitat Fragmentation
17.3K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
17.3K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.0K
Ecological Niches
23.4K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
23.4K
Conservation of Small Populations
13.1K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
13.1K
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
18
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) rely on two core types of data: spatial data and attribute data.Spatial DataSpatial data defines the physical location of features within a coordinate system, typically expressed in terms of latitude and longitude. It provides precise positioning for elements like roads, rivers, or buildings.Attribute DataAttribute data complements spatial data by adding descriptive information about these features. For example, a road's spatial data includes its start and...
18
Levels of Use of a GIS
22
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) operate across three levels of application, each representing an increasing degree of complexity: data management, analysis, and prediction. These levels reflect the expanding functionality and versatility of GIS technology in handling spatial data for diverse purposes.Data ManagementAt its foundational level, GIS serves as a tool for data management, enabling the input, storage, retrieval, and organization of spatial data. This level is often employed in...
22


