Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

The Uncertainty Principle

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Conserved residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026

Same author

DRUMBEAT temporally resolved interpretable machine learning model for characterizing state transitions in protein dynamics.

Communications biology·2026

Same author

Allostery between Distant Structural Regions Dictates Selectivity in GPCR:G Protein Coupling.

Biochemistry·2026

Same author

Conserved Residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

The future of mathematical oncology in the age of AI.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026

Same author

Correction: Minimum uncertainty as Bayesian network model selection principle.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Minimum uncertainty as Bayesian network model selection principle.

Grigoriy Gogoshin¹, Andrei S Rodin²

¹Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, and Diabetes and Metabolism Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. ggogoshin@coh.org.

BMC Bioinformatics

|April 8, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new Minimum Uncertainty (MU) model selection principle for Bayesian Network (BN) reconstruction. MU overcomes data incommensurability issues, improving BN interpretability and enabling direct comparisons.

Keywords:

AIC APOE BD BIC Bayesian networks Conditional independence MDL Model selection criteria Mutual information Probabilistic networks Sampling error Statistical uncertainty tRNA

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Area of Science:

Computational Systems Biology
Bioinformatics
Data Science

Background:

Bayesian Network (BN) modeling is crucial in systems biology.
Dataset incommensurability causes irregularities in model selection criteria like Minimum Description Length (MDL).
This hinders the interpretation and comparison of BN model features, such as dependency strengths.

Purpose of the Study:

To derive and evaluate a novel model selection principle for Bayesian Networks.
To address contextual dependence and numerical irregularities in BN reconstruction.
To enhance the interpretability and comparability of BN models.

Main Methods:

Framing model evaluation as a misspecification problem.
Estimating sampling error effects on conditional independence using Mutual Information.
Developing the Minimum Uncertainty (MU) principle to penalize uncertainty.

Main Results:

The Minimum Uncertainty (MU) criterion demonstrates performance advantages over existing methods.
Numerical validation confirms the effectiveness of the MU principle.
Real-world data examples illustrate the benefits of the new evaluation framework.

Conclusions:

The MU principle resolves performance irregularities seen with MDL.
It offers improved convergence rates for BN reconstruction.
MU enhances BN interpretability and universality, facilitating direct inter-BN comparisons.