Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

49.4K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.4K
Biodiversity and Human Values01:24

Biodiversity and Human Values

13.0K
Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
13.0K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.3K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.3K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Life Histories01:29

Life Histories

17.6K
Overview
17.6K
Schemas01:42

Schemas

11.5K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
11.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chicken metabolism, immobilization, and post-industrial production.

Social studies of science·2024
Same author

Introduction to the urban ecologies open collection: A call for contributions on methods, ethics, and design in geographical research with urban animals.

Geo : geography and environment·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication
03:53

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication

Published on: November 17, 2023

1.0K

Sharing the Field: Reflections of More-Than-Human Field/work Encounters.

Natalie Marr1, Mirjami Lantto1, Maia Larsen1

  • 1University of Glasgow, UK.

Geohumanities
|April 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how feminist and more-than-human approaches redefine field research. It examines shared bodily and planetary ecologies, emphasizing collaborative knowledge production with nonhumans in environmental humanities research.

Keywords:
encounterfeminist epistemologiesfieldworkknowledge practicesmultispecies relations

More Related Videos

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish
11:30

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish

Published on: May 14, 2010

10.7K
Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research
05:53

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

344

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication
03:53

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication

Published on: November 17, 2023

1.0K
Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish
11:30

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish

Published on: May 14, 2010

10.7K
Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research
05:53

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

344

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Humanities
  • Feminist Epistemologies
  • Critical More-than-Human Methodologies

Background:

  • The concept of 'field' has been historically defined by spatial and temporal boundaries.
  • Feminist epistemologies challenge traditional notions, proposing field/work as shared and co-constitutive.
  • Environmental humanities increasingly incorporate critical more-than-human perspectives, broadening knowledge production.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the shared nature of bodily and planetary ecologies within field/work.
  • To critically examine the lived experiences and practical implications of conducting field research.
  • To investigate the collaborative role of nonhumans in shaping research processes and outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-disciplinary accounts of field encounters.
  • Focus on practice and process in research.
  • Contributions from researchers, artists, practitioners, and writers.

Main Results:

  • Nonhuman entities actively participate in and influence research.
  • Field encounters reshape human and non-human bodies and perspectives.
  • Exploration of the affective dimensions of field research.

Conclusions:

  • Fieldwork is a dynamic, co-constitutive process involving humans and nonhumans.
  • Rethinking 'field' necessitates acknowledging shared ecologies and interspecies collaboration.
  • Offers insights into the transformative potential of interdisciplinary, more-than-human approaches in environmental research.