Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

00:09
Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
9.3K
Predicting Pregnancy in Preconception Weight Loss Trials: Is it Possible?
Jacqueline F Hayes1,2, Suzanne Phelan3, Elissa Jelalian1,2
1Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA.
Obesity Science & Practice
|April 9, 2025
Summary
Self-reported pregnancy likelihood predicts conception in weight loss trials, but with low accuracy. Further methods are needed to improve prediction of conception in preconception studies.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Health
- Clinical Trials
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Predicting conception is crucial for preconception weight loss intervention trials.
- Accurate prediction aids in trial design and participant selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate self-reported pregnancy likelihood and timing as predictors of conception.
- To assess the accuracy of these self-reported measures in a preconception cohort.
Main Methods:
- Adults (n=184) with overweight/obesity and prior gestational diabetes mellitus participated in a weight loss intervention or control.
- Participants reported estimated pregnancy likelihood (1-10) and expected timeframe at baseline.
Main Results:
- 62 participants (30%) conceived over 4 years.
- A high likelihood of pregnancy rating (8-10) was associated with higher conception rates (45.7% vs. 21.1%).
- Sensitivity and specificity of high likelihood rating for predicting conception were 69% and 58%, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Self-reported pregnancy likelihood is a predictor of conception but has limited accuracy.
- Additional screening methods are needed to improve conception prediction in preconception trials.
Keywords:
gestational diabetesmeasurement/assessmentpregnancy likelihoodpre‐conception behavioral weight lossMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Study Designs in Epidemiology
144
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
144

