Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Dual-mode Imaging of Cutaneous Tissue Oxygenation and Vascular Function
Published on: December 8, 2010
Standard Dermatoscope Images vs an Autonomous Total Body Photography and Dermoscopic Imaging Device
Pau Rosés-Gibert1,2,3,4, Cristina Heras3, Narcis Ricart5
1Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Importance:
Recent advancements in autonomous medical devices for skin imaging offer the potential to improve the efficiency and quality of total body photography (TBP) and dermatoscopic documentation, which are essential in treating patients with skin cancer, especially those with high-risk melanoma with atypical mole syndrome.
Objective:
To compare the image quality and time efficiency of an autonomous TBP and dermoscopic device for TBP and dermoscopic imaging with traditional manual digital dermoscopic techniques.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
A prospective cohort study was conducted from March 1, 2023, to October 30, 2023, comparing image quality and time efficiency between an autonomous TBP and dermoscopic device and manual dermoscopic documentation across 316 patients with atypical mole syndrome at 2 dermatology clinics in Spain. All analyses took place in June 2024.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was the acceptability of the images, assessed by 2 independent dermatologists. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic agreement between the 2 methods and time efficiency for image acquisition.
Results:
Overall, mean (SD) age of patients was 47.13 (3.31) years. The number of male patients was 105 (33%), while the number of female patients was 211 (66%). The autonomous TBP and dermoscopic device produced dermoscopic images with a mean (SD) quality score of 9.84 (0.72), compared with 9.44 (0.85) for manual digital dermoscopy, with no significant differences by body site or lesion type. Diagnostic classification agreement between the 2 methods was 91.60%, with most discrepancies related to small benign lesions. The mean (SD) imaging time for the autonomous device was 570 (169) seconds, compared with 606 (286) seconds for the manual method.
Conclusions And Relevance:
This cohort study found that the autonomous TBP and dermoscopic device produced images of comparable quality to standard dermoscopic techniques while operating with greater time efficiency. These findings suggest that the device may contribute to clinical workflow optimization in dermatology by supporting TBP and dermoscopic imaging.
More Related Videos
09:37Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition
Published on: August 18, 2022
06:48Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
Published on: June 7, 2024