Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

39.5K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.5K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

34.1K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.1K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.6K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.2K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.2K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.3K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From human teams to hybrid intelligence teams: identifying, characterizing, and evaluating foundational quality attributes.

Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems·2026
Same author

The ecological origins of collectivism and individualism.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Power asymmetry destabilizes reciprocal cooperation in social dilemmas.

Journal of theoretical biology·2025
Same author

Social class and prosociality: A meta-analytic review.

Psychological bulletin·2025
Same author

Psychological adaptations for fitness interdependence underlie cooperation across human ecologies.

Psychological review·2024
Same author

Institutions and cooperation: A meta-analysis of structural features in social dilemmas.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2025

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.7K

Partner perceptions during brief online interactions shape partner selection and cooperation.

Tiffany Matej Hrkalovic1,2, Bernd Dudzik2, Hayley Hung2

  • 1Department of Applied and Experimental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|April 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Partner selection for cooperation relies on perceived warmth and competence, with warmth cues detectable in online interactions. Selected partners elicit more cooperative behavior in social tasks.

More Related Videos

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

390
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2025

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.7K
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

390
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Partner selection is crucial for cooperation, driven by perceptions of warmth and competence.
  • Integrating impression formation and task affordances complicates partner selection.
  • Limited research exists on factors influencing partner selection for cooperative tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how person perceptions (warmth, competence), task affordances, and nonverbal cues affect partner selection for cooperation.
  • Examine the role of warmth and competence traits in partner choice.
  • Analyze the predictability of perceptions from facial and acoustic behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • Participants evaluated potential partners based on warmth/competence traits during brief online conversations.
  • Evaluations and partner selections were recorded before participants engaged in a cooperative task.
  • Facial and acoustic nonverbal behaviors were analyzed for their predictive power.

Main Results:

  • Person perceptions significantly guided partner selection, with trait relevance influencing predictive power.
  • Warmth perceptions were predictable from facial and acoustic cues, unlike competence perceptions.
  • Individuals exhibited greater cooperation with chosen partners compared to unchosen ones in online settings.

Conclusions:

  • Person perceptions, particularly warmth, are key in partner selection for cooperative tasks.
  • Nonverbal cues offer insights into perceived warmth during online interactions.
  • Findings inform the design of socially intelligent systems for partner selection.