Related Experiment Videos
Human observing: maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|May 1, 1985
Summary
College students preferred stimuli linked to larger rewards, demonstrating conditioned reinforcement. Observing responses improved efficiency, especially with high-effort tasks, contradicting uncertainty-reduction theories.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Operant Conditioning
- Decision Making
Background:
- Observing responses can influence behavior efficiency.
- Conditioned reinforcement plays a role in choice behavior.
- Uncertainty-reduction theories attempt to explain observational learning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how observing responses affects the efficiency of reinforced behavior in college students.
- To test the conditioned-reinforcement hypothesis against the uncertainty-reduction hypothesis.
- To examine the role of response effort and information in observational learning.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments utilized mixed schedules of reinforcement (variable-interval/extinction).
- Participants made choices between stimuli correlated with different reinforcement amounts or contingencies.
- Response efficiency and stimulus preference were measured under varying conditions of effort and information.
Main Results:
- In Experiment 1, participants preferred stimuli associated with larger average rewards, supporting conditioned reinforcement.
- In Experiment 2, preference shifted towards stimuli that allowed for more efficient response distributions, particularly with high-effort responses.
- Observing stimuli that did not improve response efficiency did not maintain preference.
Conclusions:
- Observing responses are sensitive to the potential for increased response efficiency and conditioned reinforcement.
- The findings support a conditioned-reinforcement account over an uncertainty-reduction model.
- Response effort significantly modulates the value of observing stimuli that signal reinforcement opportunities.