Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
Application of ultrasound for quantitative assessment of body fat mass
Yang Gao1, Xinyi Tang1, Bingjie Liu1
1Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.
Background & Aims:
Obesity is a significant health concern associated with various diseases. Accurate measurement of body fat mass (BFM) and local fat thickness (FT) is crucial for health assessment. Ultrasound offers a non-invasive, portable, and cost-effective alternative for measuring FT, but its application for quantitative BFM estimation has not been fully explored. This study aimed to develop and validate a quantitative estimation algorithm for BFM based on local FT measured by ultrasound.
Methods:
A total of 179 volunteers were randomly divided into modeling and verification groups. BFM was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and FT was measured at 10 sites throughout the body using ultrasound. In the modeling group, the correlation between FT and BFM at different sites was analyzed, and a BFM estimation algorithm based on FT was developed using multiple linear regression. The accuracy of the estimation equation was validated in the verification group.
Results:
Men had lower BFM than women (P < 0.05). At most sites, the FT of males was less than that of females (P < 0.001). Significant positive correlations were observed between FT at various sites (site 1 to 10) and BFM across all groups (P < 0.01). The estimation algorithm revealed that FT at 4 sites (intra-abdominal, posterior right perinephric, abdominal subcutaneous, and anterior upper arm) contributed to BFM estimation for men, while two additional sites (pre-peritoneal and posterior lower leg) were valuable for women. The R2 for the algorithms was 0.882 for men and 0.907 for women, with the standard error of estimate of 2.04 kg for both. The intraclass correlation coefficient between ultrasound-derived estimated BFM and the BFM measured by BIA in the verification group was 0.848 (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
BFM can be quantitatively estimated using a fitting algorithm based on ultrasound-derived local FT.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

