Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Early Detection of Drug-Induced Renal Hemodynamic Dysfunction Using Sonographic Technology in Rats
Published on: March 11, 2016
Annual Renal Surveillance With Ultrasound in All Anorectal Malformations May Not Be Necessary
Shruthi Srinivas1, Kristina Booth2, Susan Kasubick-Tillman2
1Department of Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
Insights
Annual renal ultrasounds (RUS) for children with mild anorectal malformations (ARM) rarely detect asymptomatic issues. Most children with normal initial RUS after repair do not require further screening, saving resources and reducing patient burden.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Urology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Children with anorectal malformations (ARM) face a higher risk of developing renal anomalies.
- Current protocols often involve annual renal ultrasounds (RUS) for all ARM patients, regardless of symptom severity.
- The necessity of this aggressive screening approach for all ARM cases remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of children with various types of less severe ARM managed under a protocol of routine annual renal ultrasounds (RUS).
- To determine the clinical utility and yield of aggressive renal screening in this pediatric population.
- To assess the long-term impact of RUS screening on identifying and managing renal anomalies in children with mild ARM.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review was conducted at a single pediatric colorectal center from 2014 to 2023.
- Included were children with less severe ARM (e.g., fistulas, stenosis, atresia) who underwent RUS within two years of primary repair.
- Data on demographics, clinical variables, and RUS findings (pre- and post-repair) were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Main Results:
- Out of 333 eligible children, 197 had a postoperative RUS within two years. The majority (70.1%) showed normal initial postoperative RUS results.
- Only four patients (2.0%) had RUS findings that became abnormal on later scans.
- A single asymptomatic child (0.5%) had a renal anomaly detected via RUS that required intervention, despite undergoing multiple screenings.
Conclusions:
- In children with mild ARM, routine annual RUS after primary repair yields a low incidence of intervention-requiring asymptomatic renal anomalies (0.5%).
- If the initial postoperative RUS is normal in patients with mild ARM, subsequent annual screening of asymptomatic individuals is unlikely to be necessary.
- This suggests a potential shift towards more selective renal screening protocols in this patient group, optimizing resource allocation and minimizing patient burden.
Background:
Children with anorectal malformations (ARMs) are at risk of renal anomalies. Therefore, we obtain annual renal ultrasounds (RUS) regardless of symptoms or complexity. The utility of aggressive screening in all ARM is unknown. Thus, we aimed to determine outcomes in children with all ARM managed on this protocol.
Methods:
We performed a single-institution review of children managed at a large pediatric colorectal center from 2014 to 2023 with less severe ARM (rectoperineal fistula, rectovaginal fistula, rectovestibular fistula, rectal/anal stenosis, and rectal atresia) with RUS obtained within 2 years of primary repair. We evaluated all RUS before and after repair. Demographics and clinical variables were collected, and descriptive statistics were computed.
Results:
There were 333 children meeting inclusion criteria; 197 had a postoperative RUS within two years of repair. Most (70.1 %) had a normal first postoperative RUS, and only four (2.0 %) progressed to become abnormal on subsequent studies. Only one of these patients (0.5 %) was asymptomatic at the time of RUS and had a finding necessitating further intervention. Children with an initially normal RUS underwent a median of 3 further RUS [IQR: 2-4], with 33 children (24.6 %) undergoing five or more normal RUS. Overall, 197 children with a normal postoperative RUS needed to be screened yearly to find one asymptomatic renal anomaly.
Conclusion:
In a large cohort of children with mild ARM, only one child (0.5 %) benefited from screening RUS with an asymptomatic renal anomaly requiring intervention, suggesting that if RUS after primary repair of a mild ARM is normal, additional screening of the asymptomatic patient is not necessary.
Level Of Evidence:
III = Retrospective Comparative Study.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System II: Inspection and Palpation
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System III: Percussion and Auscultation
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

