Characterising the volume and variation of multiple urgent suspected cancer referrals in England, April 2013-March 2018: a national cohort study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025
Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
Published on: February 6, 2020
Kirstin Roberts1,2, Nicola Cooper1, Laura Webster1
1National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Leeds, UK.
Objectives:
To establish a methodology to categorise urgent suspected cancer (USC) referrals in England and use these categories to understand individual patient referral patterns by demographic characteristics, financial year and referral pathway.
Design:
Cross-sectional population-based cohort study.
Setting:
From Cancer Waiting Times data, linked to demographic information held by the National Disease Registration Service, referral-level data on all USC referrals in England between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2018.
Participants:
After restricting records to those with an English postcode at referral and with complete demographic information, 9 524 435 referrals were identified for 7 542 592 patients.
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures:
USC referrals were categorised into first and subsequent USC referrals, based primarily on intervals between referral dates. Our primary outcome was to describe the distribution of referral categories by financial year, suspected cancer referral type and four demographic variables. Our secondary aim was to understand which suspected cancer referral types were found in combination within the first 4 months.
Results:
During the study period, 7.5 million people had an USC referral, with one in five having more than one referral, with 9.5 million referrals in total. Referrals were categorised as first (91.1%) and subsequent (8.9%) USC referrals. The relative increase in the number of referrals across the study period was largest (78.2%) for subsequent USC referrals.Subsequent referrals were most common in the gynaecological (10%), lung (10%) and haematological cancer pathways (12%).Suspected lower gastrointestinal referrals were most frequently included in a pair of USC referrals; it was one of the five most common pairings for 14 out of 16 referral type pathways, contributing to 30% of upper gastrointestinal USC referral pairings.
Conclusion:
Multiple USC referrals increased in the study period, particularly within a year of the first referral. Common referral pairings suggest opportunities for pathway reorganisation where common non-specific symptoms result in multiple USC referrals.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Cancer Survival Analysis
01:15Respiratory Volumes
Tidal Volume (TV) Tidal volume (TV) is the air inhaled or exhaled in a...
01:20Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
01:30Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...