Circulating Tumor DNA in Addition to Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Dual-Test Colorectal Cancer Screening Approach

  • 0Gastro Unit, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new dual-test approach using circulating tumor (ct)DNA markers alongside fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) significantly improves colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. This method enhances early diagnosis and could optimize screening by reducing unnecessary colonoscopies.

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Diagnostics
  • Gastroenterology

Background

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening aims to reduce incidence and mortality.
  • Fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are standard but have limited specificity, straining colonoscopy resources.
  • Circulating tumor (ct)DNA markers offer potential for improved early CRC detection.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To evaluate ctDNA markers (BCAT1, IKZF1, IRF4) in a dual-test strategy for early CRC detection.
  • To assess the performance of this dual-test approach in FIT-positive individuals.
  • To benchmark the dual-test against FIT alone for optimizing screening efficiency.

Main Methods

  • Plasma samples from 774 FIT-positive individuals were analyzed for hypermethylated ctDNA markers.
  • Multivariate logistic regression models incorporated ctDNA markers and age with FIT values.
  • The dual-test approach was compared to FIT alone using Area Under the Curve (AUC) metrics.

Main Results

  • The dual-test approach demonstrated superior CRC detection (AUC 87.2%) compared to FIT alone (AUC 72.5%).
  • Performance improved for detecting advanced adenomas as well (AUC 71.8% vs 65.5%).
  • The dual-test strategy could reduce colonoscopy needs by up to 56% or increase CRC detection by 28%.

Conclusions

  • A dual-test approach combining ctDNA markers with FIT enhances sensitivity and specificity for CRC detection.
  • This strategy is effective in asymptomatic individuals, improving early diagnosis rates.
  • ctDNA panels can optimize CRC screening protocols, particularly when FIT cutoffs are adjusted.